- Original Message -
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com
wrote:
- Original Message -
What problem are the _mri_/_jruby_ parameters solving?
a) If a script or command-line user requires a specific
interpreter,
it can just refer to
Dne 23.1.2013 18:59, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/JRuby 1.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
What should /usr/bin/ruby point to? During standard Gem packaging process,
the executable files
Bohuslav Kabrda (bkab...@redhat.com) said:
JRuby and Ruby won't share extensions. Extensions for Ruby will live in
%{_libdir}/gems/ruby, while extensions for JRuby will in
%{_datadir}/gems/jruby (although we decided not to actually ship any JRuby
extension Gems for F19 as we want to take
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
What problem are the _mri_/_jruby_ parameters solving?
a) If a script or command-line user requires a specific interpreter,
it can just refer to a path of the specific interpreter
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
What problem are the _mri_/_jruby_ parameters solving?
Generally, we are trying to get into Fedora more Ruby interpreters, we are
currently speaking about Ruby MRI, JRuby and Rubinius in near future.
Therefore, we would
On 01/24/2013 11:07 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bohuslav Kabrda (bkab...@redhat.com) said:
JRuby and Ruby won't share extensions. Extensions for Ruby will live in
%{_libdir}/gems/ruby, while extensions for JRuby will in
%{_datadir}/gems/jruby (although we decided not to actually ship any
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Changes in packaging
None yet. JRuby will be able to use pure Ruby Gems packaged into
RPM out of
the box, but packaging of Gems with JRuby extensions is turning
out to be
very
On 01/23/2013 07:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new
I think the more interesting question is what to do about extensions
(ie. not pure Ruby gems that contain C code). Last time I looked
JRuby was pretty incompatible; in fact for libguestfs we recommend
that people use the *Java* bindings with JRuby ...
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
What should /usr/bin/ruby point to?
Took a look just to make sure -- this portion needs to get into the new
packaging guidelines. Maybe in the Applicatoins section?
-Toshio
pgpFRnqNwXwpf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 12:44:16PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 01/23/2013 07:28 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
As JRuby is setup to share pure ruby gems with ruby, I don't think this can
be approved (inlcuding the update to the jruby package to do this) until FPC
rules on whether it's okay
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
= Features/JRuby 1.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
What should /usr/bin/ruby point to? During standard Gem packaging process,
the executable files in Gems get shebangs according to the binary
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the
- Original Message -
I think the more interesting question is what to do about extensions
(ie. not pure Ruby gems that contain C code). Last time I looked
JRuby was pretty incompatible; in fact for libguestfs we recommend
that people use the *Java* bindings with JRuby ...
Rich.
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
= Features/JRuby 1.7 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7
What should /usr/bin/ruby point to? During standard Gem
packaging process,
the executable files in Gems
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com
wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features
are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on
devel-announce list.
FESCo votes on new
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:05:23AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required
to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce
list.
FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the
18 matches
Mail list logo
