On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 11:42 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > This is a big deal, because even users who don't use modularity at all (but
> > have not uninstalled fedora-repos-modular) will not be able to upgrade to
> > Fedora 39+ without reaching for help.
> >
> > Adam outlined 3 options
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 11:13 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> 2. We need to work out 1-2 methods we 'support' for upgrading which of the
> ones below I would say D and A where certain tooling will check to see if
> the upgrade is possible and then alert if it isn't and try a method of
> turning
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 06:16, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora
> 39
> no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades.
> When
> users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with
>
V Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:16:14PM +0200, Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora
> 39 no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades.
> When users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with
>
Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said:
> On 04. 08. 23 14:45, Chris Adams wrote:
> >Could the repo config be removed by having fedora-repos Obsolete:
> >fedora-repos-moduler <= 39?
>
> That has already been done. But when the upgrade happens, the repo
> config is still there, to be removed in the
On 04. 08. 23 14:45, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said:
With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for
Fedora 39 no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem
during upgrades. When users try to upgrade from previous Fedora
releases with
Once upon a time, Miro Hrončok said:
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for
> Fedora 39 no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem
> during upgrades. When users try to upgrade from previous Fedora
> releases with fedora-repos-modular installed, they
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks like the public 'rawhide' location *does* still have a Modular
> > > tree:
> > >
> > >
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> > It looks like the public 'rawhide' location *does* still have a Modular
> > tree:
> >
> > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Modular/
> >
> > but there's still a problem there, because...it's now
On Fri, Aug 04, 2023 at 11:42:07AM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora
> > 39
> > no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during
On Fri, 2023-08-04 at 12:16 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> With the retirement of modularity, the modular dnf repositories for Fedora 39
> no longer exist. However, this will introduce a problem during upgrades. When
> users try to upgrade from previous Fedora releases with
11 matches
Mail list logo
