Re: Review swaps

Hi! On Wed, May 8, 2024, at 12:05 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:10 AM Kan-Ru Chen wrote: >> The other two are trivial rust packages that I need for upcoming libchewing >> release: >> >> rust-xflags-macrios: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276537 >>

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:10 AM Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have 3 packages awaiting reviews. I'm happy to exchange. > > First is a new IBus input method (code includes bits of C and Python): > > ibus-array: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2275556 > > The other two are

Re: Review swaps for deps needed for conda update

On 12/2/23 19:32, Orion Poplawski wrote: I have a number of packages needing review that are required for the latest round of updates to the conda package manager: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2025802_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=13378412# I'm particularly excited by libmamba

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 07:05:35PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:16:41AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > > Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to be > > reviewed: > > > > ocaml-ptime:

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 09:16:41AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need to be > reviewed: > > ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903 > ocaml-crunch: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242904 >

Re: Review swaps

On 11/17/23 19:16, Jerry James wrote: > Who would like to swap package reviews?  I've got 4 packages that need > to be reviewed: > > ocaml-ptime: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2242903 > > ocaml-crunch:

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:35 PM Scott Talbert wrote: > I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while > back. But yeah, it would be nice to have a working fedora-review. Thank you, Scott. Having someone familiar with cvc5 review it would be great. Like I just told

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:26 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages > (without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of > fedora-review on Rawhide. Thank you. I can wait. :-) I started a thread about fixing fedora-review in

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, 19 Jul 2023, Jerry James wrote: Finally, a replacement for the existing cvc4 package: cvc5: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2223012 I'm happy to take cvc5, since I just packaged it for Debian a little while back. But yeah, it would be nice to have a working

Re: Review swaps

Just to let you know I'm still up for reviewing those ocaml-* packages (without swaps), but I'm waiting on a final resolution of fedora-review on Rawhide. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog:

Re: Review swaps for easy Rust packages

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 11:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > In order to update the "log" crate (the canonical logging facade for > Rust; packaged as rust-log) to the latest version, I need to package a > few new dependencies. Some have already been updated / built in a > rawhide side

Re: review swaps

On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:17:09AM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hi Zbigniew, > > > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer: > > > > #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful

Re: review swaps

Hi Zbigniew, On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 11:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I have a bunch of nice python packages looking for a reviewer: > > #2121902 pyinstrument - Python profiler with colorful output I've taken the profiler. Do you think you could take 2180418? I would really

Re: Review swaps

Hello Jerry, I've taken the musescore review (I haven't been able to keep up with the font packaging changes). Could you please have a look at this package in return? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2180418 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Review swaps

On 3/21/23 08:18, Riya Bisht wrote: > Hello, > > I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ? > I'm beginner trying to understand fedora packaging. > Welcome to Fedora! https://jamezone.org/pleasure/software/Fedora/packager/

Re: Review swaps

Hello, I'm interested in reviewing packages. Can you tell me how do I start ? I'm beginner trying to understand fedora packaging. Thanks. On Tue, 21 Mar 2023, 8:58 am Jerry James, wrote: > Hi all, > > I am in need of some package reviews, and am happy to swap. First, I > think I have

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

Wi do, thank you! --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Wednesday, October 5th, 2022 at 7:10 AM, Mattia Verga

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

Il 04/10/22 17:34, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto: > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd > be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of > yours. > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 > CalcMySky

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 16:14:08 + Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto: > > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + > > Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > > >> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If > >> you'd be so kind as to

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

Thank you! --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 11:14 AM, Mattia Verga via

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

Il 04/10/22 17:46, Dan Horák ha scritto: > On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + > Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > >> Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If >> you'd be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more >> of yours. >> >> QXlsx

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

Thank you, on it! --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, October 4th, 2022 at 10:46 AM, Dan Horák

Re: Review Swaps to support Stellarium 1.0

On Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:34:37 + Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > Hi! Stellarium 1.0 was just released, and it grew some dependencies. If you'd > be so kind as to review one or more of these, I'll review one or more of > yours. > > QXlsx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2131838 >

Re: Review swaps for 3 nagios plugins

2. lokakuuta 2022 22.30.02 GMT+03:00 Till Hofmann kirjoitti: >I'm looking for reviews or review swaps for 3 nagios plugins: > >python-nagios-plugins-check_systemd >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2082886 > >nagios-plugins-check_ssl_cert

Re: Review swaps

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:31 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the place. Thank you! > > ocaml-ppx-import: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104693 > > Do you know which other package(s) need this? The latest version of frama-c needs

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:43:43PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I need 2 OCaml package reviews in order to update existing packages to > the most recent versions. > > ocaml-camlp-streams: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104283 I took this one, it's a core package needed all over the

Re: Review swaps

Hi, I have 2 small python packages and 1 C/C++/Qt program, but it shouldn't be too much work. btrfs-assistant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093585 python-axolotl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2043231 python-axolotl-curve25519

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 5:04 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Taken all three. Thank you! > I have the following two python packages up for review: > python-mrcfile - MRC2014 file format used in structural biology to store > image and volume data >

Re: Review swaps

On Tuesday, 12 April 2022 at 21:54, Jerry James wrote: > I need three new python packages to update python-pydata-sphinx-theme > to its latest version. Who would like to swap reviews? > > python-pep621: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074647 > python-sphinx-autobuild (unretire): >

Re: Review swaps

I would really appreciate a review for 'apptainer', just a name change from 'singularity': https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758 Dave On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:47:10AM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki > wrote: > > I've got this

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:34 AM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote: > I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685 > pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code > > I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return.

Re: Review swaps

I've got this sad boy waiting for a review since September: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006685 pasdoc - Documentation generator for Pascal source code I can review some C, C++, Pascal or shell stuff in return. A.FI. ___ devel mailing

Re: Review swaps

On 5/01/2022 05:04, Jerry James wrote: On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James wrote: Happy New Year! I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack: - ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160 - ocaml-odoc-parser:

Re: Review swaps

On Sat, Jan 1, 2022 at 7:46 PM Jerry James wrote: > Happy New Year! > > I am in need of some package reviews to update parts of the OCaml stack: > > - ocaml-bos: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031160 > - ocaml-odoc-parser: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036395 > -

Re: Review swaps for git-lfs/go-minify deps

Hi I can take these. I'd have a bunch of mingw-qt6-* packages up for review, all straight forward: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 - mingw-qt6-qtlocation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009215 - mingw-qt6-qtsensors

Re: Review swaps: python-keyrings-alt and python-annexremote

On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 10:13:39 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001684 This one remains to be reviewed, any one for a swap please? :) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:16 PM Jerry James wrote: > Who would like to swap package reviews? I need these 6: > > fontawesome5-fonts > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1989300 > This one has been mentioned previously on this mailing list. It is > blocking the review of

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 5:02 PM Jerry James wrote: > python-pydata-sphinx-theme: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981997, requires > python-jupyter-sphinx and python-pytest-regressions This is the last review I need for the python-networkx update. I'm willing to swap reviews or

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

Le 16/07/2021 à 10:39, Christopher Engelhard a écrit : Hi all, I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer libraries from the nextcloud package. The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a total of 24 new packages that need reviewing. The

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

On 2021-07-19 11:58, Tomas Korbar wrote: Hi guys, I will review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621 Thanks. Note that php-giggsey-libphonenumber-for-php requires php-giggsey-locale, which is also not in the repos yet.

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

Hi guys, I will review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982618 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1982621 For exchange could you Christopher please review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1983601 ? On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 8:40 PM Christopher Engelhard wrote:

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

On 18.07.21 16:06, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > mt32emu - C/C++ library for emulating Roland MT-32, CM-32L and LAPC-I > synthesizer modules > A cmake project that is somewhat complicated by the fact that it comes > from a monorepo that also contains other related projects. >

Re: Review swaps: A bunch of PHP libraries

Christopher Engelhard kirjoitti 16.7.2021 klo 11.39: Hi all, I finally found some time to unbundle all the 3rdparty PHP/composer libraries from the nextcloud package. The bad news is that due to their various dependency trees, I now have a total of 24 new packages that need reviewing. The good

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 3:40 AM Karolina Surma wrote: > I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I > started to work on independently. Thank you! Let me know if I can do anything for you. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Review swaps

Hey Jerry, I've taken python-pytest-datadir and python-pytest-regressions which I started to work on independently. Cheers, Karolina On 7/14/21 1:02 AM, Jerry James wrote: A new version of python-networkx is out. In order to keep building documentation for it, the following new packages

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:46 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > I'll take them. Apart from ocaml-atd I will have more ocaml > dependencies for infer soon. Thank you, Michel. I'm happy to review those when you have them ready. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, 2021-04-16 at 15:49 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Hi all, > > I have mentioned previously on this list that I want to update > ocaml-ocamlgraph to version 2.0.0.  It has two consumers in Fedora: > frama-c (which is ready to move to the new version) and ocaml-dose3 > (which is not). > >

Re: Review swaps

Il 17/03/21 16:51, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto: > Hello! > > I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for > someone to > help in exchange of some of yours. > I'll try to work on some of them in the weekend, I already own you a couple of reviews, at least. BTW, I

Re: Review swaps and advice for python / fortran / octave modules

On 11/6/20 2:09 AM, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Hello all, I have a couple of new review tickets for which I may need some advice from experts of Python / Fortran / Octave modules: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893539 (calceph) -

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:05 PM Jared K. Smith wrote: > I went ahead and grabbed the two remaining ones. Thank you very much, Jared. I appreciate you taking time to help me out. Let me know if I can do something for you. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 10:23 AM Jerry James wrote: > Many thanks to Jared Smith, Fabio Valentini, and Ankur Sinha for doing > the first 10 reviews on this list. I appreciate the time all of you put into those reviews. I've still got two to go. Who would like to > swap? > > 11.

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 5:10 PM Jerry James wrote: > Thanks to Jared, #1 and #2 are done. Who has packages sitting in the > review queue? You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours ... from 6 > feet away while wearing masks, of course. Here is the rest of what I > need: Many thanks to Jared

Re: Review swaps

On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 1:44 PM Jerry James wrote: > Hello everybody. The latest version of ocaml-ppx-inline-test requires > ocaml-time-now, which we do not currently have in Fedora. That > package is at the terminus of a small tree of dependencies we don't > have. I would like to swap reviews

Re: Review swaps

On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 9:16 AM Qiyu Yan wrote: > This works, but due to the mass rebuild and the mirrors available for > me didn't get synced. Preparing the buildroot will take unreasonable > long time here, maybe letting others interested to continue. Sure, thank you for the antic review, Qiyu.

Re: Review swaps

Robert-André Mauchin 于2020年8月2日周日 上午1:47写道： > > On Saturday, 1 August 2020 05:07:52 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote: > > Jerry James 于 2020年8月1日周六 上午5:24写道： > > > > > I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in > > > the normaliz package. The second depends on the first: > > > > >

Re: Review swaps

On Saturday, 1 August 2020 05:07:52 CEST Qiyu Yan wrote: > Jerry James 于 2020年8月1日周六 上午5:24写道： > > > I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in > > the normaliz package. The second depends on the first: > > > > antic:

Re: Review swaps

Jerry James 于 2020年8月1日周六 上午5:24写道： > I need two packages reviewed to enable some optional functionality in > the normaliz package. The second depends on the first: > > antic: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862615 Done for this. > > e-antic:

Re: Review swaps

I took it. вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 06:28, Chenxiong Qi : > > Hello everyone, > > Could anyone please review these three packages? > > python-django-uuslug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463 > > python-django-contrib-comments > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562 >

Re: Review swaps

El jue., 7 may. 2020 a las 18:04, Ian McInerney () escribió: > I'll swap my git-revise ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830306) package for > python-ovirt-engine-sdk4. And if no one else needs a swap I could also take > sqm-scripts. > > I will hopefully do the review in the next

Re: Review swaps

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:03 PM Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > Hello, > > I'm looking for these packages to be reviewed. Anyone interested in some > reviews in exchange? > > python-ovirt-engine-sdk4 - Python SDK for version 4 of the oVirt Engine API >

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 9:01 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > I can review these. Would you be able to review these two if you have > some time please? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827957 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828079 Will do. Thank you, Ankur! -- Jerry James

Re: Review swaps

Hi Jerry, On Tue, May 05, 2020 15:16:03 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > The latest version of gap-pkg-semigroups has two new dependencies. > Who would like to swap reviews? I need these two: > > gap-pkg-ferret: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1830322 > gap-pkg-images:

Re: Review swaps

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 1:40 PM Jerry James wrote: > It turns out that, in addition to the above, I need 3 other packages > to update Frama-C properly, which means I need to swap six reviews in > all. Let's try this again. I managed to forget one (I really need seven reviews), and two have been

Re: Review swaps

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 13:40:31 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jerry James wrote: > > The latest release of Frama-C needs ocaml-ppx-deriving, which in turn > > needs two other packages we don't have in Fedora. I'm willing to swap > > reviews for the following: > > >

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 8:16 PM Jerry James wrote: > The latest release of Frama-C needs ocaml-ppx-deriving, which in turn > needs two other packages we don't have in Fedora. I'm willing to swap > reviews for the following: > > ocaml-ppxfind: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1798796

Re: Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing

Thanks a lot, Ankur! I will follow up in the BZ itself. Jirka On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 8:44 PM Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 01:18:48 +0100, Jiri Hladky wrote: > > Hi, > > Hi Jirka, > > > I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software > package > > for the

Re: Review swaps - practrand - Software package for the Randon number generation & testing

On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 01:18:48 +0100, Jiri Hladky wrote: > Hi, Hi Jirka, > I have a simple package for review. It's called practrand - a Software package > for the Randon number generation & testing > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1795461 I see that it hasn't been taken up for

Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)

Hi Fabio, On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 2:42 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > I'll take a look at your review requests. I've been steeping in Java > packaging for so long that I might as well do it ;) Thank you! I'm glad to have your expert eye take a look. > I'll have some simple packages for you to

Re: Review swaps (antlr4 reboot)

On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 05:44 Jerry James wrote: > Greetings, > > The antlr4 package needs a reboot so that it can ship the various > language runtime libraries, and so that it can be updated to the > latest version. I have been in contact with the maintainers of the > current antlr4 package and

Re: Review swaps for odoc

On Sunday, 12 January 2020 06:40:41 CET Jerry James wrote: > Greetings all, > > Dan Čermák and I have been talking about getting Facebook's Infer tool > into Fedora. Infer is a static code analyzer for C, C#, C++, and > Java. I've put together package reviews for a batch of dependencies. > The

Re: Review swaps

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 3:47 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > > > Can somebody help me with some reviews, the first two > > being more urgent than others. I can swap with anything > > in exchange. > I've reviewed the first two. I'll try to get to the others over the next day or two.

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 19:27:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like some help to review a handful of Golang packages: Missed this e-mail. Sorry Robert! I'm happy to help with Golang reviews too. Are there any more reviews pending? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha

Re: Review swaps

On Saturday, 27 July 2019 01:59:11 CEST Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Robert-André Mauchin > > wrote: > > Review Request: wgctrl - Control of WireGuard interfaces on multiple > > platforms > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730911 > > Done. > > > Review

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 2:26 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Review Request: wgctrl - Control of WireGuard interfaces on multiple > platforms > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1730911 > Done. > Review Request: golang-github-mattn-ieproxy - Detect the proxy settings on > Windows

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:20 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Done the remaining ones :) Robert-André, you are amazing. Thank you again. Let me know if I can help you at all. I am deeply in your debt. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/

Re: Review swaps

On Sunday, 7 July 2019 05:01:04 CEST Jerry James wrote: > I'm working on getting some optional dependencies of sagemath into > Fedora. All of these should be fairly simple reviews. Let me know > what I can review for you in exchange. > > gap-pkg-happrime:

Re: Review swaps

On Sat, 2019-07-06 at 21:01 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I'm working on getting some optional dependencies of sagemath into > Fedora. All of these should be fairly simple reviews. Let me know > what I can review for you in exchange. > > gap-pkg-happrime:

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 9:55 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Still okay for swapping? I'm looking for a review for: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1719798 > > It's Intel SVT-AV1 encoder, x86_64 only. It is a dev snapshot as the latest > release does not have the decoder enabled.

Re: Review swaps

On Sunday, 9 June 2019 03:41:00 CEST Jerry James wrote: > It's time for another game of "my package just grew some new > dependencies." I need reviews for the following and am willing to do > reviews in exchange: > > 1. catch2: a C++ header-only test framework for unit tests >

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:36 AM Tom Hughes wrote: > I've already done those two... Well, then, I owe Jared some reviews. Jared, give me a yell the next time you have packages that need to be reviewed. I'll try to beat Tom to them next time. :-) Regards, -- Jerry James

Re: Review swaps

I've already done those two... Tom On 15/02/2019 18:25, Jared K. Smith wrote: OK, I think your packages all have reviews now.  Would you be willing to do these two in return?  They're both re-reviews of previously approved but then retired NodeJS packages. nodejs-is-plain-obj:

Re: Review swaps

OK, I think your packages all have reviews now. Would you be willing to do these two in return? They're both re-reviews of previously approved but then retired NodeJS packages. nodejs-is-plain-obj: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676540 nodejs-event-stream:

Re: Review swaps

On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 8:09 AM Jared K. Smith wrote: > I'm reviewing them now, and will respond with two that I'd like you to review > after I'm done. Thank you, Jared! Much appreciated. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing

Re: Review swaps

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 11:01 PM Jerry James wrote: > > I still need one or more reviewers for these packages. > I'm reviewing them now, and will respond with two that I'd like you to review after I'm done. -Jared ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 9:22 PM Jerry James wrote: > Sagemath 8.6 is out, which means that at long last we can upgrade the > gap package. Upgrading gap means dealing with the fact that some of > the fundamental group libraries have now been split out of the main > package and have their own

Re: Review swaps

I fifth that... Because he was the only guy from Fedora project, who gave me feed-back about my proposal for a new package : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581240 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/avigne/pcb-rnd/ Thank you Robert-André. -- Alain V. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:12

Re: Review swaps

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 13:07 Alois Mahdal wrote: > > > On 07/09/2018 12:36 AM, Jerry James wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > >> I took care of: > >> > >> - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 > >> - lfsc:

Re: Review swaps

On 07/09/2018 12:36 AM, Jerry James wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: >> I took care of: >> >> - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 >> - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 >> - symfpu:

Re: Review swaps

On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, Jerry James wrote: I took care of: - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 I would like to give a shout out to Robert-André for

Re: Review swaps

On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 9:49 AM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I took care of: > > - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 > - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 > - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 I would like to give a

Re: Review swaps

I took care of: - cadical: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599012 - lfsc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599013 - symfpu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1599014 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Review swaps

On mardi 20 mars 2018 23:35:04 CET djb djb wrote: > Ok..I'll do json one when I get home > > On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith > > > > wrote: > >> I have done all of them

Re: Review swaps

Ok..I'll do json one when I get home On Mar 20, 2018 5:19 PM, "Jared K. Smith" wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith > wrote: > >> I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk- >> unofficial and

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 5:02 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk- > unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson . > I've now finished golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial as well. -Jared

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:38 PM, djb djb wrote: > Jared, which ones have you so far? > I have done all of them except for golang-github-ncw-dropbox-sdk-unofficial and golang-github-bitly-simplejson . > I would like to do: > > Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson

Re: Review swaps

Jared, which ones have you so far? I would like to do: Review Request: golang-github-bitly-simplejson - Go package to interact with arbitrary JSON https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ show_bug.cgi?id=1555345 if you have not done that one so far. Thanks On Sat,

Re: Review swaps

Le vendredi 16 mars 2018 à 17:33 -0400, Jared K. Smith a écrit : > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin com> wrote: > > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are > > all renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which >

Re: Review swaps

On vendredi 16 mars 2018 22:33:42 CET Jared K. Smith wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin > > wrote: > > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are all > > renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which > >

Re: Review swaps

On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > I'm looking for some help to review some Golang packages. These are all > renamed packages to conform with the new Golang guidelines which > standardizes package names. These are super simple devel only package

Re: Review swaps

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > Hello, > > I have a handful of packages that I'd like to be reviewed. I'm available for > any reviews you want in exchange (to the best of my ability). Hello, I'm happy to take ddgr and QEverCloud. Are you willing

  1   2   3   >