Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Sigh ... now there are *three* incompatible Ruby syntax / semantics
standards to deal with.
Don't spread FUD please.
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage
their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to be RVM in Fedora, but we dropped it,
Dne 2.1.2013 12:08, Stijn Hoop napsal(a):
Hi,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a):
Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to
manage their own Ruby environments? ;-)
There used to
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
According to Ruby 2.0 release schedule:
- code freeze: 23 Dec.
- 2.0.0-rc1 release: 1W Jan. (expected)
- 2.0.0-rc2 release: 1W Feb. (expected)
- 2.0.0-p0 release: 24 Feb.
the official release
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:47:56 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
...snip...
- Due to better integration of JRuby into Fedora [3], we would
like to take this opportunity to restructure RubyGems folder
layout. This should allow us to support Rubinius in the
- Original Message -
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:47:56 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
...snip...
- Due to better integration of JRuby into Fedora [3], we would
like to take this opportunity to restructure RubyGems folder
layout. This should