Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-13 Thread Alexander Bokovoy
On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? It is current, and Samba in F20 will never

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-13 Thread Pete Travis
On Sep 7, 2014 11:58 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current:

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-08 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? It is current, and Samba in F20 will never have the AD bits. Maybe F22, or perhaps

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-07 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Hi! Samba4 in Fedora can't be a AD DC still. You should rebuild srpm with proper spec changes or build it from sources. krege. Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current:

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-07 Thread Simo Sorce
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ? Thanks in advance! It is current, and Samba

Re: Samba as AD DC

2014-09-07 Thread Sergio Belkin
Thanks! 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com: On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current: