On Mon, 08 Sep 2014, Simone Caronni wrote:
Hello,
2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
It is current, and Samba in F20 will never
On Sep 7, 2014 11:58 AM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current:
Hello,
2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
It is current, and Samba in F20 will never have the AD bits.
Maybe F22, or perhaps
Hi!
Samba4 in Fedora can't be a AD DC still. You should rebuild srpm with
proper spec changes or build it from sources.
krege.
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current:
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ?
Thanks in advance!
It is current, and Samba
Thanks!
2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com:
On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
Hi,
Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain
Controller?
I mean is that page current: