Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-04 Thread Enrico Scholz
Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com writes: Upstream reports a logging bug. ??? You and Noa Resare were the only one who reported the non-logging as a bug and some posts ago you said that you are not upstream. So, why do you think that upstream reported a logging bug? I pointed you to

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Enrico Scholz wrote: %post can give out something; e.g. '%post failed' which would happen here due to the redhat-lsb bug. I just give out a more useful message than '%post failed' which helps people to identify the problem. %post MUST *NEVER* FAIL!!! The mandatory (MUST) guideline is that

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-04 Thread Panu Matilainen
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: Enrico Scholz wrote: %post can give out something; e.g. '%post failed' which would happen here due to the redhat-lsb bug. I just give out a more useful message than '%post failed' which helps people to identify the problem. %post MUST *NEVER* FAIL!!!

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-04 Thread Kevin Kofler
Enrico Scholz wrote: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: The mandatory (MUST) guideline is that %post MUST NOT OUTPUT anything this means only output like license agreements, but not diagnostic output on stderr No, diagnostic output is also not allowed, especially not when the

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-04 Thread Enrico Scholz
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: The mandatory (MUST) guideline is that %post MUST NOT OUTPUT anything this means only output like license agreements, but not diagnostic output on stderr No, diagnostic output is also not allowed, from where do you have this information?

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-04 Thread Paul Wouters
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Enrico Scholz wrote: [ two year tor insanity ] It's been two years. I'm done with this discussion. I'm not spending more time on the tor-enrico pacakge. Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-03 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 02:26:19PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote: Upstream reports a logging bug. You claim to know better and WONTFIX because obviously you have more experience in the legalities of running tor nodes and the police then upstream does.. What is the big problem with the

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-03 Thread Enrico Scholz
Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com writes: Upstream reports a logging bug. ??? You and Noa Resare were the only one who reported the non-logging as a bug and some posts ago you said that you are not upstream. So, why do you think that upstream reported a logging bug? WONTFIX; The

Re: bz532373, was Re: tor dependency insanity.

2010-03-03 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Enrico Scholz wrote: Upstream reports a logging bug. ??? You and Noa Resare were the only one who reported the non-logging as a bug and some posts ago you said that you are not upstream. So, why do you think that upstream reported a logging bug? I pointed you to