On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Any sites affected by these removals are broken in upstream Firefox. I don't
> see any reason Fedora software should be compatible with more sites than
> Firefox.
Agreed.
What will happen when upgrading Fedora
On Wed, 2016-01-06 at 12:56 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Well, the problem was never software that Fedora was shipping. The
> problem is Fedora *as a client*. There are unfortunately many
> websites
> out there that are still signed by insecure certificates. We
> certainly
> need to choose a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2016 11:23 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is any important software (e.g. openssl, gnutls, glib-networking,
> Qt) in Fedora still relying on our legacy 1024-bit root RSA
> certificates?
>
> I believe Fedora is currently the only