Jonathan Underwood writes:
> On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> ...
>> Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the
>> change?
>
> Those unaware of history are doomed to repeat it :)
That's why I'm asking ;)
> It previously was the case that packages th
On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific files
> there. I believe it was done the other way around... Those files are
> useless without emacs to beg
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:17:15 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > 2) A dependency on emacs-filesystem is primarily for packages, which store
> > files in those directories, but which do _not_ need Emacs to be installed.
> > Splitting off emacs- subpackages is not always the most wise/convenient
> > choic
Am 05.01.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Jan Synacek:
Michael Schwendt writes:
2) A dependency on emacs-filesystem is primarily for packages, which store
files in those directories, but which do _not_ need Emacs to be installed.
Splitting off emacs- subpackages is not always the most wise/convenient
ch
Michael Schwendt writes:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:35:51 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
>> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific files
>> there. I believe it was done the other way around... Th
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:35:51 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific files
> there. I believe it was done the other way around... Those files are
> useless without ema
