Thanks, I will ignore it then.
On Sunday, December 29, 2019, 9:14:54 AM CST, Kevin Fenzi
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 02:45:20PM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> I got the following:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2b1eed3d9d
> Failed to talk to
On Sun, Dec 29, 2019 at 02:45:20PM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> I got the following:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2b1eed3d9d
> Failed to talk to greenwave. How do I go about fixing it?
Nothing to do on your end, something was not working right in the stack
of
I got the following:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2b1eed3d9d
Failed to talk to greenwave. How do I go about fixing it?
Thanks!
On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 9:31:47 AM EST, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
You are welcome. Sorry for the HTML, I am away from home.
Sorry, no problem.I was referring to the following:
"The egg metadata state that the current version is a 1.0.0 release candidate,
so the 0.x versioning is correct."
But I guess that it is perhaps fine now.
Thanks!
On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 9:31:47 AM EST, Alexander Ploumistos
You are welcome. Sorry for the HTML, I am away from home.
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019, 15:12 Globe Trotter via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Thanks! There was an issue with koji and me. Now the update has been built
> and submitted for testing. Should I fix the egg issue? How.
>
Thanks! There was an issue with koji and me. Now the update has been built and
submitted for testing. Should I fix the egg issue? How.Thanks!
On Saturday, December 28, 2019, 3:34:30 AM EST, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> Any further suggestion/help? Here is the updated spec file:
>
> $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec
> Uploading (5.0KiB)...
> https://paste.centos.org/view/3a4fe4d6
>
Oh, there's also a problem with your changelog entries, the last three
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 7:35 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
> Thanks! This seems to compile again, but I can't tell what happened with koji:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39956986
Besides koji misbehaving in general in the last few days, you have
uploaded an older
Thanks! This seems to compile again, but I can't tell what happened with koji:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=39956986
Sorry, I am very lost. My earleir spec file was fine with the python2 version.
Any further suggestion/help? Here is the updated spec file:
$ fpaste
Hello again,
Replace the mv line you have in your spec file with this:
rm %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/stapler
Also, do you really need to declare PKG-INFO as documentation? It's
included with the egg metadata. If you remove it from your %files
section, the package builds fine. If you are intent on
What happens when you try this?
%setup -q -n pdf-stapler
Do not append anything after pdf-stapler
BR,
Brownsen
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, 27. December 2019 17:04, Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Friday, December 27, 2019, 9:32:29 AM CST, José Abílio Matos
Thanks!
On Friday, December 27, 2019, 9:32:29 AM CST, José Abílio Matos
wrote:
> in lines 43-44 you have:
> %prep
> %setup -q -n stapler-%{version}
> the last line should be:
> %setup -q -n stapler
as you said the directory name does not have the version in it. :-)
I tried:
%setup
On Friday, 27 December 2019 14.50.16 WET Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Thank you!
>
>
> Here is my updated spec file:
>
> $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec
> Uploading (4.8KiB)...
> https://paste.centos.org/view/6ddc6eec
>
> However, I can not change the directory to a stapler directory. I get the
Thank you!
Here is my updated spec file:
$ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec
Uploading (4.8KiB)...
https://paste.centos.org/view/6ddc6eec
However, I can not change the directory to a stapler directory. I get the
following error:
+ cd stapler-1.0.0
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.2ZnEy2: line 38: cd: stapler-1.0.0: No
Hello,
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 7:44 AM Globe Trotter via devel
wrote:
>
> However, I have a problem: the issue is that Source0 does not have the latest
> tar.bz2 while Source1 does not call it 1.0.0 though the release notes say so
> (there).
You should have just one SourceX tag for each
On Thursday, December 26, 2019, 10:34:12 AM CST, José Abílio Matos
wrote:
> Something weird in your spec file is that it has two source files:
> Source0: https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/s/stapler/stapler-%
{version}.tar.bz2
> Source1:
On Thursday, 26 December 2019 16.07.01 WET Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am tryingto repackage pdf-stapler with python3.
>
> My updated SPEC file is:
>
> https://paste.centos.org/view/b7477290
>
> This SPEC file builds the binary using
Something weird in your spec file is that it
17 matches
Mail list logo
