hpdf.h includes hpdf_version.h frpm 2.4.3 which is ready for rawhide.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
If you need help with updating please note me.
--
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Oh. Found error in my repoquery. Thank you.
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 22:11:31 +0900
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02:
> > I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a
> > more proper way.
> > I was triggered by maintainer of only
Orion Poplawski wrote on 2022/10/05 22:25:
On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02:
I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more
proper way.
I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly
the build is now untagged from f38
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 3:34 PM Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> > Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02:
> >> I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it
> >> in a more proper way.
> >> I was
On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02:
I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it
in a more proper way.
I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly
dependent) so I strongly believe it's OK in this
Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02:
I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more
proper way.
I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly dependent) so
I strongly believe it's OK in this case.
Seems not actually:
dnf
I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more
proper way.
I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly dependent) so
I strongly believe it's OK in this case.
On Wed, 5 Oct 2022 10:51:20 +0200
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at
On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 9:24 AM Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
>
> New version of libharu is building for rawhide with coresponding soname bump.
> Only vtk should be affected right now.
I see that you have already built libharu-2.4.2-1.fc38.
Did you also handle rebuilding dependent packages, or
