Re: nodejs-electron

2022-09-19 Thread Lokesh Mandvekar
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 6:06 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > if we can have chromium-src-devel ... Thanks. Couldn't find a prior bz so I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2128011 > > > > > But, one thing that could be done to simplify things would be to > > > > ship > > > > a chromiu

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-09-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
if we can have chromium-src-devel ... > > > But, one thing that could be done to simplify things would be to > > > ship > > > a chromium-src-devel package in the chromium package that > > > electron > > > could pull in. That would tightly couple the chromium and > > > electron > > > packages, but

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-09-15 Thread Lokesh Mandvekar
Resuming this thread as the podman and podman-desktop teams are looking to get podman-desktop packaged in Fedora But it's unlikely either team would be able to own the nodejs-electron dep. Would the nodejs sig and/or fedora desktop team and/or chromium maintainers be willing to package and own nod

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2022-03-27 at 14:52 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:42 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > wrote: > > > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 2:42 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > You don't have to. You can point el

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-27 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > You don't have to. You can point electron builder to your system > > > electron > > > and >  it will

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-22 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Tuesday, March 22, 2022 2:11:08 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 15:56 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Saturday, March 19, 2022 7:01:46 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-21 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 15:56 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Saturday, March 19, 2022 7:01:46 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 27

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-21 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Saturday, March 19, 2022 7:01:46 AM CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > > wrote: > > > > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > > > > > > You don't h

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sun, 2022-02-27 at 17:15 +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > wrote: > > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > > > You don't have to. You can point electron builder to your system > > > electron > > > and >  it will

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-08 Thread nick black
Neal Gompa left as an exercise for the reader: > Note that this is F36+ only, and will eventually be in EPEL 9 once its > dependency chain is in EPEL[1]. > [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2053866 yep, i've already rebuilt my package for f37 and f36! -- nick black -=- https://www

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-06 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Mar 6, 2022 at 9:22 AM nick black wrote: > > Neal Gompa left as an exercise for the reader: > > Reduced configuration to offer what we can ship. But it does have > > H.264 support through OpenH264 and AAC support through fdk-aac-free. > > outstanding; it ought support at least everything O

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-06 Thread nick black
Neal Gompa left as an exercise for the reader: > Reduced configuration to offer what we can ship. But it does have > H.264 support through OpenH264 and AAC support through fdk-aac-free. outstanding; it ought support at least everything OIIO supports, then. thanks much to everyone who made this hap

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-05 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 5:21 PM nick black wrote: > > Andreas Schneider left as an exercise for the reader: > > Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in Fedora. > > oh hey great! i'm currently using OpenImageIO in Notcurses on > Fedora because ffmpeg wasn't available, bu

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-03-05 Thread nick black
Andreas Schneider left as an exercise for the reader: > Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in Fedora. oh hey great! i'm currently using OpenImageIO in Notcurses on Fedora because ffmpeg wasn't available, but i'd rather be using ffmpeg. i see it just got in a few wee

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 2/27/22 02:32, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Sunday, 27 February 2022 01:37:08 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> On 2/26/22 02:21, Andreas Schneider wrote: >>> On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote: I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth for

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 2:04 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 27/02/2022 19:03, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > Unless H.266 (VVC) takes off, and we get to > > start the cycle all over again until 2040 or > > so (rough estimate on patent expiration). > > H.266 is not popular. Most video servic

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 27/02/2022 19:03, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: Unless H.266 (VVC) takes off, and we get to start the cycle all over again until 2040 or so (rough estimate on patent expiration). H.266 is not popular. Most video services (Youtube, Twitch, etc.) have started to switch to the royalty-free AV1 codec.

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 10:06:17 CET Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > > You don't have to. You can point electron builder to your system electron > > and it will use that. Then you just do not package the electron files. > > All you need is t

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 27/02/2022 10:51, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Wow, going off-topic here, but that's great news that should have been highlighted and announced. There will be great news when the H.264 and H.265 patents finally expire. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Il 25/02/22 10:53, Andreas Schneider ha scritto: > This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in Fedora. Wow, going off-topic here, but that's great news that should have been highlighted and announced. There are several packages that have some functionalities disabled because ffmpeg was

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
On 27/02/2022 08:23, Andreas Schneider wrote: You don't have to. You can point electron builder to your system electron and it will use that. Then you just do not package the electron files. All you need is the resources directory. You must run electron-builder on Fedora Koji. Pre-built package

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-27 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Saturday, 26 February 2022 14:19:40 CET Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 08:02 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] > > > bui

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-26 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Sunday, 27 February 2022 01:37:08 CET Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > On 2/26/22 02:21, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote: > >> I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth > >> forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help with

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-26 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 2/26/22 02:21, Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote: >> I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth >> forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help with Electron and all >> Electron-based applications that come into Fedora. >

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-26 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2022-02-25 at 08:02 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider > wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] > > built on > > Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build > > for Fe

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-25 Thread Andreas Schneider
On Friday, 25 February 2022 14:02:11 CET Neal Gompa wrote: > I think this is probably one of those things that would be worth > forming a SIG on. An Electron SIG could help with Electron and all > Electron-based applications that come into Fedora. That would be fine by me. The most obvious applica

Re: nodejs-electron

2022-02-25 Thread Neal Gompa
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 4:54 AM Andreas Schneider wrote: > > Hello! > > Over the past 8 month, I've been working on getting Electron [1] built on > Fedora. Yesterday I was finally able to do the first working build for Fedora > Rawhide [2]. This was possible because we finally have ffmpeg [3] in F