Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
Timing could have been better. But the workflow I'm going to work towards is the have fedpkg retire handle got and pkgdb then have pkgdb handle the koji side. With the end result being that you just do 1 thing. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Iain Arnell

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-16 Thread Iain Arnell
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > One thing that became clear during the mass rebuild is that people are > not following the proper procedure to retire packages > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life > lists the current process.  I have some

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-16 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:53:11 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > The Bulk of the mass rebuild is done and will shortly be tagged into > f17 http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/f17-failures.html is a list of the > packages that failed to build. im working on double checking that we > attempted every

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-16 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:27:45 -0600 Dennis Gilmore escribió: > starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide > for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. > > as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) > packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 t

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/05/2012 11:55 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains. Neither does an "ordered rebuild". Even assuming the concept of

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On 01/05/2012 03:10 PM, Brendan Jones wrote: I've seen nils' list and a few of my packages are on it. What can we do now to fix it? I've noticed some koji builds for the new compiler but other than that, should I wait for the FTB.. to come in? One of my packages was on the list, it had a simpl

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Adam Jackson
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 22:38 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > They do not mean the resulting packages are more or less broken than > those having been built by predecessors of the toolchains. Neither does an "ordered rebuild". Even assuming the concept of ordering was any more well defined than ts

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Brendan Jones
On 01/04/2012 06:27 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build packages them

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/05/2012 10:06 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I guess you are referring an "ordered rebuild", not a "simple sequential rebuild". The latter would be mostly useless. For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 21:47 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > I guess you are referring an "ordered rebuild", not a "simple sequential > rebuild". > > The latter would be mostly useless. For bootstrapping, ideally there would be ordered rebuilds, but even any mass rebuild assists more than having

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/05/2012 09:21 PM, Jon Masters wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 Tom Callaway escribió: On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the mass rebuild or if all pac

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread ニール・ゴンパ
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 > > Tom Callaway escribió: > > > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for t

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Jon Masters
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 11:18 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 > Tom Callaway escribió: > > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the > > > mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of depende

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2012-01-05 20:34, Rex Dieter wrote: > Ville Skyttä wrote: > >> On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >>> ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17 >> >> I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you >> rephrase? > > Rebuild all packages, so they end up with fc17 d

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Rex Dieter
Ville Skyttä wrote: > On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17 > > I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you > rephrase? Rebuild all packages, so they end up with fc17 disttags, to help avoid the "why do I have a fc15 p

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Ville Skyttä
On 2012-01-05 19:18, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > ideally drop all the disttags prior to fc17 I hope I'm just having trouble parsing this correctly. Could you rephrase? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Dennis Gilmore
El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 10:37:41 -0500 Tom Callaway escribió: > On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the > > mass rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc > > were going to be rebuilt. > > My understanding is t

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Tom Callaway
On 01/05/2012 09:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I just didn't know if there was any "filtering" going on for the mass > rebuild or if all packages, regardless of dependence on gcc were going > to be rebuilt. My understanding is that we traditionally rebuild everything at the time of a mass rebuild,

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Richard Shaw
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2012-01-04, Richard Shaw wrote: >> I assume this is only required for packages that use gcc? So any other >> packages (perl, python, java, etc.) are excluded from this, correct? >> > A lot of modules in interpreted languages use compiled glue

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-05 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2012-01-04, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide >> for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. >> >> as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) >> packagers will have jus

Re: Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-04 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for > gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. > > as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) > packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to bu

Rebuild for GCC-4.7

2012-01-04 Thread Dennis Gilmore
starting immediatly there is going to be a mass rebuild of rawhide for gcc-4.7 that landed yesterday. as approved by FESCo (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/739) packagers will have just over a week, until Thursday Jan 12 to build packages themselves. After that date releng will kick off an