Fixed my broken packages in rawhide:
* libjingle - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3623092
* rekall - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3623152
* xbase - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3623229
* xsupplicant -
Thanks for the pointers.
By running this command, I have signed up for iwhd-related
notifications in F-16 and rawhide:
ssh fedorapeople.org autoqa-optin iwhd devel F-16
With this command you will subscribe for rpmlint and rpmguard test results for
every new build [1].
Depcheck and
On 2012-01-03 16:07, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one
- Rawhide automatically inherits the F16 (or older) builds.
I find it useful.
Me too, but beware, sometimes the inheritance is explicitly disabled.
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:22:21PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On 2012-01-03 16:07, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one
- Rawhide automatically inherits the F16 (or older) builds.
I find it useful.
Me too, but beware, sometimes
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
Once you do a first Rawhide build I do not know how to revert it.
Untag all the Rawhide builds with koji untag-pkg f17 NVR.
Be warned that rel-eng is going to yell at you if you do this without
ensuring that the EVR inherited from F16 is newer. FESCo decided that EVRs
On 12/31/2011 12:56 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide (December 23th package list) using
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64, and for those packages that failed also
rebuilt the same package with
On 01/02/2012 06:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Nils Philippsen wrote:
...
I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if
one of your packages is affected or not.
...
iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev
Thank you for the list.
I have just tried to build iwhd on F16
On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:03:44 +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
The tested version (the one in rawhide) is iwhd-1.1,
while the latest is 1.2 (which is in F16). Shame on me
for not putting the latest also in rawhide.
If you never do a build in Rawhide - your latest build is the F16 one
- Rawhide
2012/1/3 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com:
On 01/02/2012 06:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Nils Philippsen wrote:
...
I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if
one of your packages is affected or not.
...
iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev
Thank you for the list.
Hi Jim,
2012/1/3 devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is there some sort of reminder service that could be configured to nag the
maintainers of a package in a situation like this? Personally, I would
appreciate it, and I think Fedora would benefit if we could do something to
minimize
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
I have just tried to build iwhd on F16 using a pretty recent gcc-4.7.x
(built manually: 4.7.0 20111202), and it worked fine, so I'm not quite
sure why iwhd is on the list. Maybe the gcc-4.7.x that Jakub used
lacks something
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 07:03:44PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
I have just tried to build iwhd on F16 using a pretty recent gcc-4.7.x
(built manually: 4.7.0 20111202), and it worked fine, so I'm not quite
sure why iwhd is on the list. Maybe the gcc-4.7.x that Jakub used
Denis Arnaud wrote:
Hi Jim,
2012/1/3 devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Is there some sort of reminder service that could be configured to nag the
maintainers of a package in a situation like this? Personally, I would
appreciate it, and I think Fedora would benefit if we
On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 12:56 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide (December 23th package list) using
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64, and for those packages that failed also
rebuilt the same
On Jan 2, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if
one of your packages is affected or not.
Hello,
It seems one of my packages has an issue, the gcc unistd.h include one. How
do I reproduce the build issues? Is there a
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 09:09:29AM -0700, Nathanael Noblet wrote:
On Jan 2, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if
one of your packages is affected or not.
It seems one of my packages has an issue, the gcc
Nils Philippsen wrote:
...
I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if
one of your packages is affected or not.
...
iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev
Thank you for the list.
I have just tried to build iwhd on F16 using a pretty recent gcc-4.7.x
(built manually:
Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide (December 23th package list) using
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64, and for those packages that failed also
rebuilt the same package with gcc-4.6.2-1.fc16 to quickly remove from the
list
if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi!
As part of preparations to switch GCC in F17 to GCC 4.7.0, I've performed
a test mass rebuild of rawhide
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
a few gcj/objc dependent packages not strictly required). We still have
lots of *.fc15,
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 16:35:00 +0100,
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
a
On 2011-12-31 13:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64
Is this package available somewhere?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
=?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU2t5dHTDpA==?= ville.sky...@iki.fi writes:
On 2011-12-31 13:56, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
gcc-4.7.0-0.1.fc17 on x86_64
Is this package available somewhere?
It'd be a lot easier for packagers to work on fixing their packages for
it if there were a build available for F16.
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 04:25:06PM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
IMHO a mass
El Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:35:00 +0100
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com escribió:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it
next week.
IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
a few
25 matches
Mail list logo
