Review swap request: python-datalad

Hi folks, The deps are all packaged so datalad is also up for review now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002848 Happy to swap reviews, as always :) It's an awesome tool for use in scientific (and other) work. Here's the handbook for a quick glance:

Re: Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

Hi On 27.07.21 22:50, Major Hayden wrote:   python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1981573   python-azure-devtools (for testing the Azure CLI/SDK)   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1986414   python-azure-mgmt-insights

Azure CLI + SDK packaging update and review swap request

Hey folks, Thanks to everyone who helped with package reviews and guidance as I cobbled together the Azure CLI and SDK packages. The work is almost complete! There are a few remaining packages left to review: python-azure-appconfiguration (required SDK component)

Re: Review swap request: python-xds-protos

On 7/23/21 2:35 PM, Ben Beasley wrote: I’d like to get python-xds-protos (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35. This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s ultimately

Review swap request: python-xds-protos

I’d like to get python-xds-protos (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1980041) reviewed so I can update grpc to version 1.39.0 in Rawhide in time for Fedora 35. This is a new dependency for grpc—a weirdly circular one that’s ultimately generated from sources inside grpc, but is

Re: Review Swap Request

Looks like python-userpath exists already, albeit for rawhide only. I'd like to review pipx (this will be my first review). If you could in turn review mopidy-mpd, that would be greatly appreciated. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1792086

Review Swap Request

Hello, I have two packages for a review swap - they should be fairly straightforward.  python3-userpath is a python module for manipulating the $PATH variable for several shells; also it is a dependency of pipx : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1790232 pipx is a tool for

Re: Review swap request

On 6/2/2018 1:34 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hi all, > > The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp > package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it. > > To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in > Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc,

Review swap request

Hi all, The linux-igd package no longer builds against the latest libupnp package and upstream is dead so I'm going to retire it. To replace it I am packaging miniupnpd, which is strangely not in Fedora while the client tool, miniupnpc, is packaged.

Re: Package review swap request

On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 10:40 AM Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Hello, > Wine 3.9 has introduced a dependency on a new library for Direct3D 12 functionality. > I'd like to get this package review ASAP. Please share a review you would like to swap. > vkd3d -

Package review swap request

Hello, Wine 3.9 has introduced a dependency on a new library for Direct3D 12 functionality. I'd like to get this package review ASAP. Please share a review you would like to swap. vkd3d - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582861 Thanks, Michael

Re: Review swap request for package cvechecker

e. >> >> So I did commented in comment 7 this March. However, there is no update >> till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas >> suggest me to ask for a review swap request. > > Zamir, > > open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of

Re: Review swap request for package cvechecker

; till now. I dropped an email to packaging list[2] just now and Tomas > suggest me to ask for a review swap request. Zamir, open a new bug, and close #1062808 as the duplicate of the new one. Package review bugs are always tied to the name of the ori

Review swap request for package cvechecker

for a review swap request. So I am writing to see if anyone can help me with the process. Thanks! [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062808 [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QXKAKW72B73CGBJHHUATW6SMP2F2XORK/?sort=date -- Ziqian SUN

Review Swap Request

Hello all, I would like to request a review for the OpenShift Origin package and would be happy to review someone else's package in return. origin - OpenShift Open Source Container Management by Red Hat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287822 Thank you, -AdamM -- devel

Review swap request

This is a quite simple review: kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042 I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor. Thanks Mattia -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review swap request

On 28/11/15 17:12, Mattia Verga wrote: This is a quite simple review: kpmcore https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285042 I can take another package to swap reviews, but I'm not a sponsor. I've taken it, if you wouldn't mind looking at

Re: Package review swap request -- golang-launchpad-go-xdg-v0

Hi Adam, Take! Please, can you take this for me https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240126 ? Thanks in advance Regards - gil Il 25/11/2015 22:02, Adam Goode ha scritto: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279660 This is a pre-req for packaging

Package review swap request -- golang-launchpad-go-xdg-v0

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279660 This is a pre-req for packaging https://github.com/google/cups-connector Happy to take a package to review. Note that I am not a sponsor. Thanks, Adam -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

review swap request

Hello: I want to bring back cairo-dock back to Fedora, which was removed on Feb 2009 from Fedora and need re-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911 cairo-dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912 cairo-dock-plug-ins cairo-dock-plug-ins depends on cairo-dock.

Review swap request: web-assets

Hi! Would someone be willing to trade me a review for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678 It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM macros. Later on it will grow some httpd magic but that's on hold until Fedora 21 since we're still sorting

Re: Review swap request: web-assets

On Aug 23, 2013 6:00 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Would someone be willing to trade me a review for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997678 It's dead simple at the moment: it just provides a couple directories and RPM macros. Later on it will

Review Swap Request

I'm working on the unbundling effort for python-requests. One stepping stone in that path is the following review request (for which I am soliciting potential reviewers): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688 That one is the highest priority, but there are a few other reviews

Re: Review Swap Request

Hi Ralph, I've taken this one and will review it before EOD. On Wed, 2013-02-27 at 11:13 -0500, Ralph Bean wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907688 Could you please review either https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912048 - mpDris2 or

Package Review Swap Request: datanommer

Hello, Anyone interested in swapping package reviews? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=853252 Thanks in advance- -Ralph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review swap request for libpfm

Hi All, I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a separate package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines. There have been some comments on package in the bz, but need to get the

Re: Review swap request for libpfm

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:44 AM, William Cohen wco...@redhat.com wrote: Hi All, I am trying to clean up the papi package. The papi package currently bundles the libpfm sources with in it. I would like to split libpfm out into a separate package to follow the Fedora packaging guidelines.  

Review swap request

lzip just split out lziprecover. If someone would be so kind as to do this quick review, I'll take one in return. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018 Thanks! -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list

Re: Review swap request

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote: lzip just split out lziprecover.  If someone would be so kind as to do this quick review, I'll take one in return. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803018 I'll take it. Here's my only open review for Fedora:

Re: Review swap request

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote: lzip just split out lziprecover.  If someone would be so kind as to do this quick review, I'll take one in return.

Re: Review swap request: moonscript, lua-alt-getopt, lua-inotify

I'm ready to swap on any from my packages awaiting review. I going to reviewing now. 24.08.2011 00:58, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Dear contributors, Is anyone interested in some review swaps? These packages should be quite straightforward: moonscript -- moonscript is to Lua what

Review swap request: moonscript, lua-alt-getopt, lua-inotify

Dear contributors, Is anyone interested in some review swaps? These packages should be quite straightforward: moonscript -- moonscript is to Lua what coffeescript is to Javascript (improved syntax, lots of convenience features -- from for-comprehensions to OOP) You need to recompile

Re: Review swap request: dexter and postler

On 04/06/2011 02:53 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim: These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently featured in OMG Ubuntu: Dexter --

Review swap request: dexter and postler

Hi all, I have a couple of review requests, one depending on the other, that I'd like to swap with: These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently featured in OMG Ubuntu: Dexter -- http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-address-book-app/

Re: Review swap request: dexter and postler

Am Mittwoch, den 06.04.2011, 02:11 +0200 schrieb Michel Alexandre Salim: These are part of the Elementary OS project, and were recently featured in OMG Ubuntu: Dexter -- http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/meet-dexter-elementarys-new-address-book-app/

Review Swap Request: iceplayer

Hi all, I created a package for iceplayer. It is a nice simple player. It supports Lyrics and many formats (a backend of GStreamer). Developers will add i18n and l10n later (they are working, until now, just Chinese). The Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=688183 The

Review swap request: Yorba's Valencia

Hi all, Yorba, the company that develops our current default photo management tool (Shotwell), finally released an updated version of Valencia, a gedit Vala development environment, a few months back. We've had this package in our review queue for a lot longer, and unfortunately the review got