On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 00:42 +0200, gil wrote:
Il 08/05/2015 00:37, Jerry James ha scritto:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Soft
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
Requested the intervention of Fedora Legal Tracker guys, for a check
Note: i asked not long ago if neo4j project, with the same Affero
General Public License,
can be imported in Fedora, but is not possible for my case.
If the package can
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
for lists of good and bad licenses. AGPLv3 is on the list of good
licenses.
HTH. Regards,
--
Il 08/05/2015 00:37, Jerry James ha scritto:
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:33 PM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote:
Hi
I'm not sure if AGPLV3 is a valid license for Fedora
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
for lists of good and bad licenses. AGPLv3 is on
Hello Everyone,
I have a package that I would like reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819
Burp is a network backup program, it provides a way automate backups.
I would appreciate a review and I'm willing to do a review swap with
somebody.
Thank you,
--
_
/-\ ndrew
