Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

2019-03-18 Thread Ben Rosser
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 PM Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 21:53 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > > I was just looking at reviewing this package: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 > > > > It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, >

Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

2019-03-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 21:53 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > I was just looking at reviewing this package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 > > It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, > which is in rpmfusion-free. The package can be built without > ff

Re: Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

2019-03-14 Thread Robert-André Mauchin
On vendredi 15 mars 2019 04:53:39 CET Jerry James wrote: > I was just looking at reviewing this package: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 > > It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, > which is in rpmfusion-free. The package can be built without f

Reviewing a package with an rpmfusion dependency

2019-03-14 Thread Jerry James
I was just looking at reviewing this package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684950 It is a Go wrapper around ffprobe, which is in the ffmpeg package, which is in rpmfusion-free. The package can be built without ffprobe, but cannot be used without it. The spec file contains this: