Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-04-03 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, W dniu 28 marca 2012 19:39 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > Hi, > > 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >>> napisał: 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : >>> [..] > There's not

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-04-03 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/29 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : > On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >>> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson :

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-28 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 03/28/2012 07:39 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : >> On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >>> napisał: 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : >>> [..] > There's nothing stopping you fro

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, 2012/3/28 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn : > On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >> W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >> napisał: >>> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : >> [..] There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other modules that add su

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-27 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 03/27/2012 09:46 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski > napisał: >> 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : > [..] >>> There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other >>> modules that add support for the protocol. >> >> I will try tomorr

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-27 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 21 marca 2012 15:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : [..] >> There's nothing stopping you from packaging up mod_spdy or any other >> modules that add support for the protocol. > > I will try tomorrow - I've got mod_fcgid package sources for reference. > > W

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/3/21 Peter Robinson : > 2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski : >> 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : >>> 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : Hi, Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html ? This is the first major release from

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-21 Thread Peter Robinson
2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski : > 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : >> 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html >>> ? >>> >>> This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features

Re: SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-21 Thread Michał Piotrowski
W dniu 13 marca 2012 21:59 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski napisał: > 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : >> 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html >>> ? >>> >>> This is the first major release from a

SPDY in F18 (was Re: F17 httpd 2.4?)

2012-03-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla : > 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski : >> Hi, >> >> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17 >> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html >> ? >> >> This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features. > > Not likely this late in the cycle,