On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging
On 28/05/15 23:03, David Smith wrote:
On 05/28/2015 10:26 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
... stuff deleted ...
Any thoughts or comments to this approach? Anyone got a better idea?
Your process looks reasonable.
Thanks!
Yes, I do know it is not good to have the keying material for the
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also contains a kernel module, which normally works
fine - until you hit Secure Boot.
On 29/05/15 14:54, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David
On Friday 29 May 2015 15:24:24 David Sommerseth wrote:
On 28/05/15 23:03, David Smith wrote:
snip
But really the best solution here is to get the mhvtl kernel module
upstream.
Agreed, but I'm not sure how keen upstream kernel developers are to
carry a driver for virtual tape devices.
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 28/05/15 17:45, Josh Boyer
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 09:28 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote:
On Sex, 2015-05-29 at 08:54 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 8:40 AM, David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29/05/15 17:04, Simon Farnsworth wrote:
On Friday 29 May 2015 15:24:24 David Sommerseth wrote:
On 28/05/15 23:03, David Smith wrote:
snip
But really the best solution here is to get the mhvtl kernel
module upstream.
Agreed, but I'm not
On 05/28/2015 10:26 AM, David Sommerseth wrote:
... stuff deleted ...
Any thoughts or comments to this approach? Anyone got a better idea?
Your process looks reasonable.
Yes, I do know it is not good to have the keying material for the
signing too easily available. So I'm also keen to
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also contains a kernel module, which normally works
fine - until you hit Secure Boot.
So I was wondering how to handle this the best way. AFAIK, there are
currently no plans to get the mhvtl.ko kernel
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:26 AM, David Sommerseth dav...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've started poking into packaging the mhvtl project for Fedora and
EPEL. This package also contains a kernel module, which normally works
fine - until you hit Secure Boot.
So I was wondering how to handle
14 matches
Mail list logo
