On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 21:17 -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
On 2011-06-26 12:33, Christoph Wickert wrote:
And I have no idea what part of our update policy should be violated by
this update. Please somebody enlighten me.
This part:
* Avoid changing the user experience if at all
For me the most important benefit is OS independent software, especially
web browser.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Debates like this expose a weakness in packaging philosophy. The
current philosophy seems to be
On 06/27/2011 07:52 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote
Debates like this expose a weakness in packaging philosophy. The
current philosophy seems to be all packages are equal.
It really isn't
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
Rahul
--
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:22 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
I apologize for the long rant.
Well...trying to think of a diplomatic way to put it, but I'd say the
long rant is fine, but we've had the same discussion at least five times
over the last couple of years and your post didn't seem to bring
On 2011-06-26 12:33, Christoph Wickert wrote:
And I have no idea what part of our update policy should be violated by
this update. Please somebody enlighten me.
This part:
* Avoid changing the user experience if at all possible.
Specifically, the update breaks a number of user-installed
Felix Miata wrote:
FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
versioning policy change.
The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of us with
their update policies, and that as a result, that Firefox security update is
not compliant with our
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:08:31 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Felix Miata wrote:
FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an
upstream versioning policy change.
The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of
us with their update
Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Felix Miata wrote:
FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
versioning policy change.
The funny thing is that Firefox is going exactly the opposite way of us with
their update policies,
They
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Felix Miata wrote:
FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which incorporates an upstream
versioning policy change.
The funny thing is
Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 13:25 -0300 schrieb Evandro Giovanini:
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Christoph Wickert
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 26.06.2011, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
Felix Miata wrote:
FF5 is the security update to FF4.0.1, which
To All
I do not understand what are talking about.
Firefox and Thunderbird now does not require any kind of linux distribution
attention.
Download bz2 archive from their site, unpack it to any directory (for example -
/usr/local/share)
and start it.
It will use USER settings in home
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:28:50 +0400
Lucas macach...@gmail.com wrote:
To All
I do not understand what are talking about.
Firefox and Thunderbird now does not require any kind of linux
distribution attention.
Download bz2 archive from their site, unpack it to any directory (for
example -
You are of course free to do this if you choose, but Fedora is a
package managed system. Doing this you lose a number of benefits of a
package management system.
For me the most important benefit is OS independent software, especially
web browser.
--
devel mailing list
Hallo,
I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15.
On
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html
you could read, that upstream doensn't release the security update
fireforx-4.0.1. Instead
users should update to
Hi,
fedora already updated to firefox 5 in fedora 15.
btw only german speaking persons could read your reference ;-)
Johannes
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.dewrote:
Hallo,
I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15.
On
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.dewrote:
Hallo,
I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15.
On
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html
you could read, that upstream
On 2011/06/25 15:32 (GMT+0200) Jochen Schmitt composed:
I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15.
On
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html
you could read, that upstream doensn't release the security update
17 matches
Mail list logo
