Re: Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

2016-02-01 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 30/01/16 09:54 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote: On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: I've seen a few spec files with content like this: %configure --disable-static --with-imagemagick --with-magickpp \ --without-libavcodec

Re: Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

2016-02-01 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > Insisting that feature requests provide an implementation is a good > way to ensure nobody bothers asking for improvements to a tool. And encouraging filing RFE's for which there is no implementor resources in

Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

2016-01-29 Thread Jonathan Wakely
I've seen a few spec files with content like this: %configure --disable-static --with-imagemagick --with-magickpp \ --without-libavcodec CPPFLAGS='-DMagickLib=MagickCore -I/usr/include/ImageMagick' There's no backslash before the CPPFLAGS variable, so it's useless. Should rpmlimt

Re: Should rpmlint warn about misleading indentation?

2016-01-29 Thread Ville Skyttä
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > I've seen a few spec files with content like this: > > %configure --disable-static --with-imagemagick --with-magickpp \ >--without-libavcodec >CPPFLAGS='-DMagickLib=MagickCore