Re: Should we retire ardour5 in rawhide?

2020-12-23 Thread Nils Philippsen
On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 13:29 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > Meanwhile, I've built the current version 6.5.0 in f33 ... > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-5a9f9cd189 > > ... but wasn't lucky in Rawhide. I haven't found out what the problem > is exactly, but it looks like it's

Re: Should we retire ardour5 in rawhide?

2020-12-23 Thread Nils Philippsen
Hi Guido, sending this from my private address, because I won't read my company email until I return to work next year ;). Please keep me in Cc. On Tue, 2020-12-22 at 10:55 +0100, Guido Aulisi wrote: > Hi, > ardour5 fails to build in rawhide and it has been obsoleted by > ardour6. > > Should we

Re: Should we retire ardour5 in rawhide?

2020-12-22 Thread Erich Eickmeyer
On 12/22/20 1:55 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: Hi, ardour5 fails to build in rawhide and it has been obsoleted by ardour6. Should we retire it in rawhide? Nils, if you can give me commit access to ardour6 I can help build the new version as they are released. My FAS account: tartina Thanks Ciao Gu

Should we retire ardour5 in rawhide?

2020-12-22 Thread Guido Aulisi
Hi, ardour5 fails to build in rawhide and it has been obsoleted by ardour6. Should we retire it in rawhide? Nils, if you can give me commit access to ardour6 I can help build the new version as they are released. My FAS account: tartina Thanks Ciao Guido signature.asc Description: This is