Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-27 Thread Thomas Rodgers
Yes. On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 12:51 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a): > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > >>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 26. 02. 23 v 17:07 Jonathan Wakely napsal(a): On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-26 Thread Thomas Rodgers
Which has a successful build in rawhide now. On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 8:08 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-26 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 18:23, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > >> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > >> I think

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Thomas Rodgers
systemtap is FTBFS because dyninst is FTBFS, see PR2173030 for dyninst. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 2:49 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 23. 02. 23 v 12:41 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it picked up older

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Thomas Rodgers
PR2173019 has been created. The file in question was updated within the last three days, but not to fix this issue. On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 7:47 AM Thomas Rodgers wrote: > ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll file a PR this

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Thomas Rodgers
ceph is FTBFS due to a change in Boost Asio. I'll file a PR this morning. usr/include/boost/asio/async_result.hpp:651:9: error: no type named 'completion_handler_type' in 'class boost::asio::async_result, void(boost::system::error_code, ceph::buffer::v15_2_0::list)>' 651 |

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Kaleb Keithley
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 8:19 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 01:11:13PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? > > > > No idea, sorry. > > Ceph is likely #2169364 aka

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 01:11:13PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? > > No idea, sorry. Ceph is likely #2169364 aka https://gcc.gnu.org/PR108773 , still unresolved GCC bug.

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 13:03, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Do you know anything about what's happening with Ceph? No idea, sorry. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 11:35:15AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this > > > week: > > > > > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:41, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:28:48PM +0100, Kalev Lember wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it picked up > older packages from a published rawhide compose that were still

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:29, Kalev Lember wrote: > I think you got something wrong with your repoquery. Perhaps it picked up > older packages from a published rawhide compose that were still linked with > older boost? > > My list of things needing rebuild is much shorter: This list is what

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > > > These are the

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 10:49, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > These are the builds in the side tag: > > >

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Kalev Lember
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:17 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > The problem is more widespread :( > > $ (dnf5 repoquery --whatrequires 'libboost_thread.so.1.78.0()(64bit)'; > dnf5 repoquery --whatrequires 'libboost_iostreams.so.1.78.0()(64bit)'; dnf5 > repoquery

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 23. 02. 23 12:16, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:49:30AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 These are the builds in the

Re: Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:49:30AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 > > These are the builds in the side tag: > > >

Some boost breakage in Fedora Rawhide

2023-02-23 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
boost 1.81.0 (side tag f39-boost) was merged into Fedora earlier this week: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=1074 These are the builds in the side tag: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=63053=-build_id=1 However I think some packages didn't