On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:18:33 +0100
Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf
Project URLs changed. Fixed in CVS, not rebuilt.
(But why was this BADSOURCE? Checked, and both tar files at old url
Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
commit sufficient?
--
Laurent Rineau
Laurent Rineau wrote:
Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs
commit sufficient?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 05:36:18PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 04:21:08PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:06:11AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
rjones:BADURL:expat-2.0.1.tar.gz:mingw32-expat
This is a bit suspicious:
2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla10
Why is it necessary for xquilla to distribute the source for xerces-c?
Why is a simple dependency on xerces-c-devel not sufficient?
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:29:40 -0500
Peter Jones pjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/10/2010 02:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
pjones:BADURL:dumpet-2.0.tar.bz2:dumpet
Should be fixed now (forgot to push the tarball to hosted)
ok.
pjones:BADURL:syslinux-3.83.tar.bz2:syslinux
Not really seeing
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:43:32 +
Mat Booth fed...@matbooth.co.uk wrote:
This is a bit suspicious:
2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla
orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla10
Why is it necessary for xquilla to distribute
