Re: *****SPAM***** Enabling GOPROXY and GOSUMDB in Fedora

reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Tip for Reporting Spam on Mailing Lists

Do not reply to or forward spam emails back to the mailing list. You just became part of the problem and many/most spam scanning services now consider YOUR email to be spam. Gmail in particular makes it very difficult to manage the spam status of individual emails (seems like you can only report

[Spam:]AKTUALISIEREN SIE IHR POSTFACH

/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2077083] Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2077083] Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io

[Bug 2077083] Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2077083] Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2077083] Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora

[Bug 2077083] Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

--- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck --- (In reply to dan from comment #0) > Previously working razor install fails when reporting spam. Until when did it work? And which changes happened that it fails now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ht

[Spam:]RE:BENUTZER AKTUALISIERUNG

...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam

[Bug 2077083] New: Razor Agent fails auth on spam report

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2077083 Bug ID: 2077083 Summary: Razor Agent fails auth on spam report Product: Fedora Version: 35 Status: NEW Component: perl-Razor-Agent Severity: high Assignee

[389-devel] SPAM-unsubscribe

t;>> >>>> Q1: why does it try to pack rust stuff if it is not enabled ? >>>> >>>> 2.2] Now the directory was there, but I still did get the same error. A >>>> closer look showed that it was looking for >>>> .../rpmbuild/BUILD/389-ds-b

Re: What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

Dne 17. 12. 20 v 12:37 Petr Šabata napsal(a): On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: Hi everybody, I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas. - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful - and a lot more failed - ELN

Re: What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas. > > > > > > - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful - > > > and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either > > > by ELN developers or auto

Re: What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:37 PM Petr Šabata wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > Hi everybody, > > > > I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas. > > > > - I'm getting serious spam

Re: What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

Petr Šabata writes: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas. >> >> - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful

Re: What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

On 17/12/2020 11:23, Fabio Valentini wrote: - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful - and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either by ELN developers or automatically by their CI) I use email notification rather than IRC so I just have

Re: What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:27 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas. > > - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful - > and a lot more failed - ELN builds for m

What to do about ELN-related "spam"?

Hi everybody, I'm unsure how to deal with this, so I'm asking here if anybody has ideas. - I'm getting serious spam from fedora-notif on IRC about successful - and a lot more failed - ELN builds for my packages (triggered either by ELN developers or automatically by their CI) - bodhi is spamming

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

id=810049 >>> >>> It's worse because there are way more spam comments and they get >>> amplified by the mails to the package-review lists as well ... >> >> Thanks to god they didn't spam to mailing list directly. >> >>> I was told to just mark comm

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

On 31/8/20 21:54, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:51 AM Christopher > wrote: >> >> This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) >> keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. >> I've been trying to

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

On 31/8/20 12:51, Christopher wrote: > This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) > keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. > I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the > flags they keep setting, and rem

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 at 14:22, Qiyu Yan wrote: > Fabio Valentini 于2020年8月31日周一 下午7:54写道： > > I'm getting *pretty annoyed* with a similar (but way worse) issue as > well: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 > > > > It's worse because th

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

Fabio Valentini 于2020年8月31日周一 下午7:54写道： > I'm getting *pretty annoyed* with a similar (but way worse) issue as well: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 > > It's worse because there are way more spam comments and they get > amplified by the mails to the packa

Re: Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 4:51 AM Christopher wrote: > > This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) > keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. > I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the > flags th

Can a bugzilla issue be locked because of spam?

This old issue (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177202) keeps receiving spam every couple of weeks from a different account. I've been trying to flag the spam comments as spam, and remove the flags they keep setting, and remove their CC as well, so they don't get follow-ups and get

Re: Spam on closed bugzilla reports

ow_bug.cgi?id=1644013 >> >> Can someone maintaining bugzilla investigate the issue? > > There's a self-service way to fix this (I see it's already been done > in this case, but here it is for the record): > > (1) On the comment click on the little label icon ("Tags"

Re: Spam on closed bugzilla reports

gate the issue? There's a self-service way to fix this (I see it's already been done in this case, but here it is for the record): (1) On the comment click on the little label icon ("Tags"). (2) Type "spam" into the field and press enter. This will hide the comment as spam

Spam on closed bugzilla reports

Hello team, It looks like spammers use closed bug report for their ads as seen in this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644013 Can someone maintaining bugzilla investigate the issue? -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer

Re: Fedora update spam (was: [Fedora Update] [comment] nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32)

https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/3831 -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the

Re: Fedora update spam (was: [Fedora Update] [comment] nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32)

something I can do to stop this spam? > > Another few hundred emails this morning too. > > Apparently if I could make this update "Obsolete" it would go away, > but there doesn't seem to be any way to do that (nor to delete the > update) through the user interface. Can you p

Re: Fedora update spam (was: [Fedora Update] [comment] nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32)

On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:19:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I understood the message the first time, so I didn't need to be > emailed 147 times (so far) about it. > > Is there something I can do to stop this spam? Another few hundred emails this morning too. Apparently if

Fedora update spam (was: [Fedora Update] [comment] nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32)

I understood the message the first time, so I didn't need to be emailed 147 times (so far) about it. Is there something I can do to stop this spam? On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 10:15:06PM +, upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > The following comment has been added to the nbdkit-1.17.1-2.fc32 upd

bugzilla-requests recipient rejected (was: Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla)

5.7.1 : Recipient address rejected: Access denied (in reply to RCPT TO command) My original report: > Subject: Bugzilla Comment Spam in Bug 1489554 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1489554#c178 is a spam > comment. > > Can you remove it? Best regards Geo

Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla

On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:05 PM Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > If anyone spots any more, please open a ticket by emailing bugzilla-requests > @redhat.com and one of us will clean it up. Thanks Alasdair, that's good to know. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla

found). They are defeating our existing anti-spam protection! If anyone spots any more, please open a ticket by emailing bugzilla-requests @redhat.com and one of us will clean it up. Alasdair ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsub

Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla

On 11/01/2018 07:23 AM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It > turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically > spamming various bugs: >

Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla

On Thu, 2018-11-01 at 12:23 +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It > turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically > spamming various bugs: >

Re: Spam/scam links in bugzilla

I have forwarded this to the Bugzilla owner. Thank you for the research on this. On Thu, 1 Nov 2018 at 08:20, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > > Hello, > > A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It > turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically >

Spam/scam links in bugzilla

Hello, A few minutes ago I was notified about a post in a closed bug. It turns out that the account that made the post has been sporadically spamming various bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=user_activity.html=run=dragoelanie%40gmail.com=2018-01-01=2018-11-01=when The websites that

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Once upon a time, Florian Weimer said: > This really should be a configurable knob in Gmail, but currently, it is > not: Gmail rejects or drops such email occasionally, so you cannot fix > things with filters. Unfortunately, Google support does not understand > DMARC and that it's their systems

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

* Todd Zullinger: > AFAIK, there's no individual subscriber control in Mailman. > It's applied to the list. (I'm nowhere close to an expert > with Mailman3 though, so corrections are welcome.) That's a pity (the lack of individual subscriber control I mean). > However, it only affects messages

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

al From header (I believe in Original-From: but it's early in the day and that's from memory, so it could be slightly off). The advantage is that domains like @gmail.com which block (or mark messages as spam) from domains like @yahoo.com will no longer do so because the list has not resent mail fr

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

* Todd Zullinger: > On the users list we enabled Mailman's DMARC mitigations > several months ago. That has allowed posts from users > @yahoo and other domains with strict DMARC settings to reach > list subscribers @gmail and other domains which honor those > DMARC settings. > > It may be

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Chris Murphy wrote: > Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML" > thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are > having their emails put into spam by google mail. > > >>This message has a from address in yahoo.co.

Re: many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Chris, On 2018-10-06 04:10, Chris Murphy wrote: Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML" thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are having their emails put into spam by google mail. Not only that but I have had cases where

many legit devel@ emails marked as spam by gmail (dmarc reject)

Semi-related to the "Attention Gmail users, please turn off HTML" thread; anyone *not* using gmail (e.g. all Yahoo email users) are having their emails put into spam by google mail. >This message has a from address in yahoo.co.uk but has failed yahoo.co.uk's >required tests fo

Re: devel mail spam

On 01/26/2018 11:16 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > I'm seeing many duplicate messages coming from r...@citadel.stu.neva.ru > for messages from the past few days. > > Anyone on it? Yeah, but note that a infrastructure ticket will reach us faster/better than a devel list post. I have blocked

devel mail spam

I'm seeing many duplicate messages coming from r...@citadel.stu.neva.ru for messages from the past few days. Anyone on it? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Spam

On 17 July 2017 at 13:34, wrote: > Hi, > > Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing > Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue? > We are looking into how this is happening. Kevin is not specifically subscribed as ke...@fedoraproject.org

Re: Spam

Hello,I received two spam emails, one in users and one in devs. Both are exactly the same.If someone can take care of them, I would be grateful. Thanks,Sylvia On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 10:41 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 07/17/2017 10:34 AM, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > > Do the list ad

Re: Spam

I have received a few on the development mailing list. On 17 Jul 2017 6:48 pm, <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: > >> I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam >> folder.

Re: Spam

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list? They're being sent to 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org (whatever that

Re: Spam

On 17 July 2017 at 13:34, wrote: > Hi, > > Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing > Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue? > We are aware of this and have been dealing with whack-a-mole in trying to fix it. > Could we please at

Re: Spam

On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 10:41:13AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam folder. > Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you, not the list? I am getting those messages as well :) -- Athos Ribeiro http://www.ime.usp.br/~a

Re: Spam

as that would be. Though I don't know what we would do if they start spoofing anyone else. They're hitting desktop@ too, so we need to take care of both lists. I haven't seen any spam on the devel list. I even checked my spam folder. Maybe the messages are being sent directly to you

Spam

Hi, Do the list admins have any plans to combat the spammers that are spoofing Kevin Fenzi to bypass the moderation queue? Could we please at least hold his messages for moderation? Maybe he could manually approve his own messages, as annoying as that would be. Though I don't know what we

Re: Mostly spam on the mips list

nfrastructure ticket and we can >> see what we can do from there. > > It's gone now. Yeah, I went in and found that almost all the spam was 1 user, so I moderated them and cleaned all their posts from the archive. kevin signature.asc

Re: Mostly spam on the mips list

> I forwarded your post to the list owners... they are at least the first > line of folks to talk to about this. Thanks! I'll try to keep that in mind (no promises=) > If they can't clear things up, then an infrastructure ticket and we can > see what we can do from there. It's gone now. Cheers

Re: Mostly spam on the mips list

On 05/24/2017 02:00 AM, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm not sure where it's best to report but today I wanted to probe the > progress of Fedora MIPS [1] but since I'm not registered to this list > I opted for the web archive. The first non-spam message [2] I could

Mostly spam on the mips list

Hi there, I'm not sure where it's best to report but today I wanted to probe the progress of Fedora MIPS [1] but since I'm not registered to this list I opted for the web archive. The first non-spam message [2] I could find is from March, everything after that is just noise. I suppose members

Re: Spam from postmaster

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:55:14AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > I'm sorry for the Chinese spam sent from a spoofed > <postmas...@fedoraproject.org> address that passed into the list. > It looks like a bug in the Mailman3 > system <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/

Spam from postmaster

Hello, I'm sorry for the Chinese spam sent from a spoofed <postmas...@fedoraproject.org> address that passed into the list. It looks like a bug in the Mailman3 system <https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5986>. I added the address to banned address list, but I don't believe

[Bug 1388782] bugzilla rejected automatically generated bug report claiming spam

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388782 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC|emman...@seyman.fr,

[Bug 1388782] New: bugzilla rejected automatically generated bug report claiming spam

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1388782 Bug ID: 1388782 Summary: bugzilla rejected automatically generated bug report claiming spam Product: Fedora Version: 25 Component: bugzilla Severity: urgent

[389-devel] No more spam from jenkins

I don't know what's wrong with jenkins. I tried to fix it, but I cannot figure out what the problem is. In the meantime, I have disabled it, so no more spam. Sorry for the spam. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389

Re: Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi ... Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I

Re: Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:19:00 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending by

Re: Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:19:00 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi,

Re: Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:50:27 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com escribió: On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi ...

Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

Hi, iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi ... Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care about such messages? I mean as long as nothing went wrong I don't really care (any I am pretty sure many others don't either). Can we make

Re: Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi ... Messages like this has been annoying like forever ... why do I care about such messages? I mean as long as nothing went wrong I don't

Re: Koji / Bodhi tagging spam

On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:50:27 -0700 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:30:28 +0100 drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, iw-3.11-1.fc20 successfully untagged from f20-updates-testing-pending by bodhi ... Messages like this has been annoying like forever ...

[SPAM] Re: Rawhide tree structure

On Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:44:54 -0600 Mike Chambers m...@miketc.net wrote: Did my eyes deceive me, or do the packages now get separated and put in their respected dir of their first letter, and not located in one dir now? Did the tree change or is this an error? This did happen and it is not

spam

I have moderated this user until they can fix their spam issues. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: spam

excellent!! 2011/10/14 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com I have moderated this user until they can fix their spam issues. kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Luis Enrique Bazán De León -- devel mailing list

bastion02.fedoraproject.org listed in sorbs.net DNSBL - can we get some better spam filtering so I don't end up blocking feodora's emails?

Nov 17 17:58:28 mail1 postfix/smtpd[29706]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from bastion02.fedoraproject.org[209.132.181.3]: 450 4.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [209.132.181.3] blocked using dnsbl.sorbs.net; Currently Sending Spam See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?209.132.181.3; from=users-boun

Re: bastion02.fedoraproject.org listed in sorbs.net DNSBL - can we get some better spam filtering so I don't end up blocking feodora's emails?

MF == Mike Fedyk mfe...@mikefedyk.com writes: MF Hopefully some better spam filtering can be implemented so that MF fedora's mail servers don't end up in spam block lists anymore. Spam filtering will never prevent every spam from getting through. The host forwards lots of mail; people

Announcement: Spam filter to to drop messages

Hello perl-de...@f.o subscribers, as Mailman 2.1.9 offers to moderate incomming messages on e-mail header basis, and Red Hat MTAs hosting fedoraproject.org mailing lists mark suspicious e-mails with X-RedHat-Spam-Warning: header, I deciced to utilize this feature to help to moderate messages