On 28 January 2010 10:38, Richard Zidlicky r...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08:25PM +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com:
I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
those kinds of tools that just
Dear All,
We currently ship xdvik as a package separate to texlive (for a
variety of reasons). Looking forward to when we ship texlive-2009,
it'll be built as part of the texlive package build once more.
However, even better would be to drop it entirely, for the following
reasons:
1) It's a
On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 18:04 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
However, it's not clear to me if okular and evince-dvi provide
equivalent functionality that we're yet in a position to drop xdvik.
Comments? If you use xdvik because other viewers don't give some
particular functionality, it would
Jussi Lehtola on 01/27/2010 01:45 PM wrote:
As a heavy LaTeX user I would be really against dropping xdvi before
there is some other app that runs as fast. Evince very slow - xdvi shows
pages straight away, whereas evince often displays Loading...
How about profiling evince instead?
perf
