> Dne 10. 11. 22 v 12:04 Remi Collet napsal(a):
>
>
> Open an issue for
>
> https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data
>
> if there is need for new SPDX id then Jilayne will request it for you and add
> it to
> fedora-license-data.
>
Just a quick process clarification here!
General
Le 10/11/2022 à 13:48, Miroslav Suchý a écrit :
Dne 10. 11. 22 v 12:04 Remi Collet napsal(a):
What is the process to ask for a new SPDX id ?
Open an issue for
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data
Done as https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/95
Rem
Dne 10. 11. 22 v 12:04 Remi Collet napsal(a):
I'm searching for License identifier for php-pecl-xdebug
which was "BSD"
It is based on PHP-3.0 which is based on BSD-3-Clause
What should I use ?
You are speaking about
https://github.com/xdebug/xdebug/blob/master/LICENSE
I pasted the content
I'm searching for License identifier for php-pecl-xdebug
which was "BSD"
It is based on PHP-3.0 which is based on BSD-3-Clause
What should I use ?
What is the process to ask for a new SPDX id ?
Thanks,
Remi
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedor
Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I don't seem to see this
>
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4828
Looks like it was unpushed recently, and re-queue'd (pending).
-- rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't seem to see this
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4828/xine-lib-1.1.20.1-3.fc17,emacs-24.0.94-3.fc17,calibre-0.8.42-1.fc17,perl-GD-SecurityImage-1.71-3.fc17,techne-0.2.1-4.fc17,gdl-0.9.2-5.fc17,autotrace-0.31.1-29.fc17.1,ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17
here: http://dl.fe
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
>>> wrote:
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>>> --
Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heiko Adams
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
>> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Heiko Adams
>> --
>> devel mail
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams
wrote:
> Hi,
> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
> --
> Regards,
>
> Heiko Adams
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedorapr
Hi,
the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is
still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay?
--
Regards,
Heiko Adams
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
12 matches
Mail list logo