On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 00:01 -0400, Braden McDaniel a écrit :
>
> > Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
> > rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to
> > supersede sys
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 08:14 -0430, Robert Marcano a écrit :
> appending helps a little, but if a security vulnerability allows a
> intruder to put binaries on ~/bin, I think it will not be difficult to
> overwrite .bash_profile (Unless something like SELinux is used to
> protect startup
>> Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
>> rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to
>> supersede system ones.
>
> Although there is probably only a small number of security
> vulnerabilities of user applications that would allow just cr
On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 00:01 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:45 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> > >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley":
> > >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha S
Le mercredi 27 juillet 2011 à 00:01 -0400, Braden McDaniel a écrit :
> Can someone explain (or point to) the rationale appending these to PATH
> rather than prepending them? I would have expected user binaries to
> supersede system ones.
Security. You can do all kinds of mischief by overriding a
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:45 -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley":
> >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >>>
> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:49:43 +0100
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> > On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> > >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley":
> > >>> On 26/07/11 10
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 08:45:11AM -0430, Robert Marcano wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley":
> >>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> >>>
> Since F15 ~/bin has been added t
On 07/26/2011 09:04 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] :
>>
>> Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this?
>
> You can. That is the case.
a clean F15 install has PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin, not the same
/etc/skel/.bash_profile but still has ~/bin
>
> Emmanuel
On 07/26/2011 09:34 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> * Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] :
>>
>> Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this?
>
> You can. That is the case.
>
> Emmanuel
>
:-)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/list
* Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:32] :
>
> Mmm ok ... Can I assume root is excepted from this?
You can. That is the case.
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
* Genes MailLists [26/07/2011 15:14] :
>
>
> >> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>
> > Unlike ~/bin, which is in PATH though not even created.
It's the other way round on my machine. Both are in my $PATH but ~/bin
exists (I may have created it by hand) and ~/.local/bin/ doesn't.
> Whe
On 07/26/2011 09:15 AM, Robert Marcano wrote:
> In /etc/skel/.bash_profile they are added to the end and I think that is ok
>
> PATH=$PATH:$HOME/.local/bin:$HOME/bin
>
> Never knew about ~/.local/bin my .bash_profile is really old from the
> time where the default was only ~/bin
Mmm ok ... Ca
On 07/26/2011 08:36 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley":
>>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>>>
Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
supposed to run user scripts will work
On 07/26/2011 08:03 AM, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
> 26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley" :
>> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>>
>>> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
>>> supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that
>>> directory. Meanwhile, ~
26.07.2011, 18:34, "Andrew Haley" :
> On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>
>> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
>> supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that
>> directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose
>> that i
On 26/07/11 10:22, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
>
> Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are
> supposed to run user scripts will work without changing into that
> directory. Meanwhile, ~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose
> that it is also added because technically it is ~/b
Hi.
Since F15 ~/bin has been added to PATH, and commands that are supposed to run
user scripts will work without changing into that directory. Meanwhile,
~/.local/bin isn't used. I'd like to propose that it is also added because
technically it is ~/bin's brother.
Yes, user scripts can be kept
18 matches
Mail list logo
