On 12/11/2010 03:33 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know we have [1], but as you can see, there are 4 people listed on
that page. That leads me to believe two things:
1. Most people don't know the page exists (I didn't until tibbs
pointed it out to me)
2. It's
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:07:51 +0100
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Hi,
there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
fashion.
I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers are
Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
I know we have [1], but as you can see, there are 4 people listed on
that page. That leads me to believe two things:
1. Most people don't know the page exists (I didn't until tibbs
pointed it out to me)
2. It's cumbersome to edit wiki for things like this
Hi,
there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
fashion.
I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers are not
available at the moment and approximate time of return to normal. It
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:07 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
Obviously not every fedora maintainer has shell account so exact
replica
of [2] wouldn't work, but I was thinking some nicer interface could be
provided. Maybe simple email with special subject line:
FAS-name - $messsage
And
Am Mittwoch, den 08.12.2010, 16:07 +0100 schrieb Stanislav Ochotnicky:
Hi,
there have been quite a few unresponsive maintainers processes in past
few months + there are people that don't respond to emails in timely
fashion.
I'd like to have a system where anyone can see which maintainers
