Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
My traceroute [v0.85] puchatek (0.0.0.0)Thu Sep 17 14:42:22 2015 Keys: Help Display mode Restart statistics Order of fields quit Packets Pings Host Loss% Snt Last

Re: Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:46:33 +0200 Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: ...snip... > This is my connection to pkgs.fedoraproject.org machine. Fetching > 48MB archive reached 36% in 2 (two) hours... > > We ship binaries through mirrors all around the world. yum/dnf knows > how to

Re: Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sep 17, 2015 06:46, "Marcin Juszkiewicz" wrote: > > My traceroute [v0.85] This is my connection to pkgs.fedoraproject.org machine. Fetching 48MB archive reached 36% in 2 (two) hours... > > We ship binaries through mirrors all around the world.

Re: Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 16:36:52 -0400 DJ Delorie wrote: > > Stephen John Smoogen writes: > > I would talk with the mirrors in your area and find out why they > > don't mirror it. > > Do mirror sites have the option to not include sources? [*] The

Re: Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread DJ Delorie
Stephen John Smoogen writes: > I would talk with the mirrors in your area and find out why they don't > mirror it. Do mirror sites have the option to not include sources? [*] If so, does letting them have this choice have GPL implications? I mean, if they're distributing

Re: Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
W dniu 17.09.2015 o 22:42, Kevin Fenzi pisze: > >I would talk with the mirrors in your area and find out why they > >don't mirror it. > >Do mirror sites have the option to not include sources? [*] The pkgs.fedoraproject.org lookaside cache? (Which is what this thread was about) No, because

Re: Why packages sources are NOT mirrored?

2015-09-17 Thread Florian Weimer
On 09/17/2015 07:26 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > And to pre-answer something that might be related, there is no budget to > put this into a CDN. Those are extremely expensive operations and do not > volunteer space. Some of them do, for Debian at least. But I don't know what has happened