On 10 September 2013 06:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2013 10:54 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Thank you for the put down. However, firstly I'm not referring to the
fqdn issue, but the mention of dropping user name and secondly I'm not
the administrator of all the
On Mon, 09.09.13 19:42, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us
defaulting to using short
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us
defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when
creating OS containers in any real numbers.
I am pretty sure we should continue to default
On 09/09/2013 07:53 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
I'd like to add myself as another datapoint for 'uses different
users', and often via ssh. In any case, that bash prompt trick surely
only works if applied to all user profiles or all systems being used.
They already are quite different between
On Wed, 21.08.13 21:06, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
I would like us to change our default to use long hostname instead as in
the fqdn or container01.ackme.com and would love any kind of feed back
in that regard ( why we should not default to that ).
+1 always good to show the
On 09/09/2013 08:05 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 09.09.13 19:42, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
And I have come across a bit of scalability
On 22 August 2013 15:50, Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 08:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
- The user@ is mostly useless; if you su/sudo to root, the character
at the end of the prompt changes from
On 09/09/2013 07:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us
defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when
creating OS containers in any real
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 21:30 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 21.08.13 18:45, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
And I have come across a bit of scalability issue due to us
defaulting to using short hostnames in login and command prompt when
creating OS containers in
On Mon, 09.09.13 18:30, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
Kerberos and x509 both require FQDNs.
It makes no sense to stick to short names for servers, and having a FQDN
on a laptop does not hurt anything (a FreeIPA enrolled laptop must have
a FQDN anyway as it uses the keytab to do
On 9 September 2013 20:53, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/09/2013 07:53 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
I'd like to add myself as another datapoint for 'uses different
users', and often via ssh. In any case, that bash prompt trick surely
only works if applied to all user profiles
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 00:35 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 09.09.13 18:30, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
Kerberos and x509 both require FQDNs.
It makes no sense to stick to short names for servers, and having a FQDN
on a laptop does not hurt anything (a FreeIPA enrolled
On 09/09/2013 10:54 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
Thank you for the put down. However, firstly I'm not referring to the
fqdn issue, but the mention of dropping user name and secondly I'm not
the administrator of all the systems I use. I was simply trying to
provide some user input here.
My proposal is
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers
to what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that his slide where a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:45 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers to
what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that
On 08/22/2013 01:06 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I would like us to change our default to use long hostname instead as in
the fqdn or container01.ackme.com and would love any kind of feed back
in that regard ( why we should not
On 08/22/2013 09:10 AM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I perfectly understand the reasons for the change and I think we should
definitely change it at least on the login screen (I like the one
additional line idea from Simo). In the
On 08/22/2013 09:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
snip
On cloud images we actually lock the root account so it's unusable. In
the case of cloud providers the standard deployment is generally along
the lines of either injecting ssh keys for root and unlocking it or
creating a standard user account,
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 10:39 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/22/2013 09:10 AM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I perfectly understand the reasons for the change and I think we should
definitely change it at least on the
On 08/22/2013 11:03 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 10:39 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/22/2013 09:10 AM, Ondrej Vasik wrote:
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
I perfectly understand the reasons for the change and I think we
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:09 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
snip
You would just overwrite in in your own .bashrc if you have long
hostname and they get in your way.
Yes, the same applies in the opposite direction.
Long hostnames are far more practical for administrators to use then
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
You would just overwrite in in your own .bashrc if you have long
hostname and they get in your way.
Long hostnames are far more practical for administrators to use then
short hostnames have ever been.
That's your opinion;
On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 08:21 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com said:
You would just overwrite in in your own .bashrc if you have long
hostname and they get in your way.
Long hostnames are far more practical for administrators to use then
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers
to what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that his slide where a bit
dated due to the changes in croup I decided to have a look at
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Now for those that are not familiar with our default using the short fqdn it
cuts the fqdn at the highest level domain as in the first dot so in the
sample case the login and command line promt is shown as
On 08/21/2013 08:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:45 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
johan...@gmail.com wrote:
Now for those that are not familiar with our default using the short fqdn it
cuts the fqdn at the highest level domain as in the first dot so in the
sample case the
On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 18:45 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Greetings all
After sitting Dan's Walsh Secure Linux Containers talk at flock where he
mentioned him and Dan B. had successfully scaled application containers
to what 8000 instances or so and I noticing that his slide where a
27 matches
Mail list logo
