Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 13:15 +0100, Jun Aruga wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:17 PM Frank R Dana Jr. > wrote: > > Hmmm. If there's a plan is to get it working again relatively soon, > > though, I should probably withdraw my PR[1] to remove mention of it > > from the Non-Responsive Maintainer Po

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-13 Thread Jun Aruga
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:17 PM Frank R Dana Jr. wrote: > > Hmmm. If there's a plan is to get it working again relatively soon, though, I > should probably withdraw my PR[1] to remove mention of it from the > Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy. (I figured, doesn't make sense to suggest a > tool

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-13 Thread Frank R Dana Jr.
Hmmm. If there's a plan is to get it working again relatively soon, though, I should probably withdraw my PR[1] to remove mention of it from the Non-Responsive Maintainer Policy. (I figured, doesn't make sense to suggest a tool that can't actually be used...) [1]: https://pagure.io/fesco/fesco-

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-10 Thread Jun Aruga
> Nope, for the reason I've explained earlier in this thread. The proposed > changes > are (last time I've tried them) breaking the mailing-list checks which I don't > think is a good thing. Sure. Sorry I missed the reason you have explained earlier in the thread. -- Jun | He - His - Him __

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 03:02:24PM +0100, Jun Aruga wrote: > > Following network graph of forks [1] we got the latest changes here [2] . > > About add it to fedora-packager , seems to me a excellent idea. > > > > Best regards, > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user/network >

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-10 Thread Jun Aruga
> Following network graph of forks [1] we got the latest changes here [2] . > About add it to fedora-packager , seems to me a excellent idea. > > Best regards, > > [1] > https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user/network > > [2] > https://github.com/junaruga/fedora-active-user/commits/feature/c

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-09 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sat, 2019-12-07 at 07:21 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:05 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon < > pin...@pingoured.fr> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:52:52PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > >First, done anyone have a working version of the script? > > Google returns > >

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-07 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:05 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:52:52PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >First, done anyone have a working version of the script? Google > returns > >the github page which hasn't been updated in 3 years and currently > fails > >trying

Re: Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-06 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:52:52PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >First, done anyone have a working version of the script? Google returns >the github page which hasn't been updated in 3 years and currently fails >trying to import the 'fedora_cert' module. There is a PR submitted that fixe

Working fedora-active-user script?

2019-12-06 Thread Richard Shaw
First, done anyone have a working version of the script? Google returns the github page which hasn't been updated in 3 years and currently fails trying to import the 'fedora_cert' module. Secondly, how is this not in a package yet? It's an extremely useful tool for determining if initiating the no