On 04. 11. 19 16:23, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 20:28 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hero maintenance
I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further
e-mails, but
this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course.
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 20:28 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hero maintenance
>
> I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further
> e-mails, but
> this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course. Sorry about
> that.
I disagree
Back in May I've got all 26478 questions (from all language sections) backed-up
with wget, after removing JS (embedded and standalone files) they take up
~890MiB of disk space.
A few dozen questions with multiple pages of answers have only the first page
with top rated answers saved.
I removed
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 16:22, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > I do not disagree with you on this. I also know we don't have a larger
> > number of system administrators, servers and time to do all the things
> > many community members 'expect a project to have'. We have the
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 13:19:41 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 03. 11. 19 23:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > >
> > > On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > > Hero maintenance
> > >
> > > I don't normally correct my typos on mailing
On 03. 11. 19 23:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hero maintenance
I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further e-mails, but
this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 14:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hero maintenance
>
> I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further e-mails,
> but
> this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course. Sorry about that.
>
I was going for
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I do not disagree with you on this. I also know we don't have a larger
> number of system administrators, servers and time to do all the things
> many community members 'expect a project to have'. We have the
> resources to do one set of things excellently, two well,
On 03. 11. 19 20:24, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hero maintenance
I don't normally correct my typos on mailing lists to avoid further e-mails, but
this one is particularly bad. I meant "zero" of course. Sorry about that.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
On 03. 11. 19 16:50, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 05:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
IMHO It should give the useres the new full link.
If that would not be possible, maybe it could read:
"Oh no, this page is not here. Try replacing ask.fedoraproject.org with
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 12:50, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > These systems are not small tasks to keep up and running.. the
> > upstream code is not 'static' or backportable so you are constantly
> > updating to upstream to keep up with CVE security. There are also
> >
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> These systems are not small tasks to keep up and running.. the
> upstream code is not 'static' or backportable so you are constantly
> updating to upstream to keep up with CVE security. There are also
> regular schema changes and a ton of packaging items which need
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 05:33, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> IMHO It should give the useres the new full link.
>
> If that would not be possible, maybe it could read:
>
> "Oh no, this page is not here. Try replacing ask.fedoraproject.org with
> askbot.fedoraproject.org to get archived content of this
On 02. 11. 19 9:23, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:12:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was
there a reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing
solutions, rather
On Sat, 2 Nov 2019 at 14:03, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> James Cassell wrote:
> > When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects,
> > and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events
> > sooner or later.
>
> This just shows how bad an idea it is to rely
On Sat, Nov 2, 2019, at 2:02 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> James Cassell wrote:
> > When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects,
> > and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events
> > sooner or later.
>
> This just shows how bad an idea it is to
James Cassell wrote:
> When I asked, the answer was that it costs money to do custom redirects,
> and the old site is going away "soon" so it would be overcome by events
> sooner or later.
This just shows how bad an idea it is to rely on third-party-hosted
services. If this were self-hosted Free
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 10:51:08 +0100, Markus Larsson wrote:
>
> If this has made you feel bad I apologize. I mean you no harm in any way.
> Clearly my tone has been off here since I managed to offend you.
No worries. I am sorry too---my tone wasn't the best either.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur
On 2 November 2019 10:18:20 CET, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:23:37 +0100, Markus Larsson wrote:
>> Not having this planned for and sorted before the change is sloppy.
>> Sadly this kind of attitude towards breakage in a production
>> environment seems makes fedora look bad and
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:23:37 +0100, Markus Larsson wrote:
> Not having this planned for and sorted before the change is sloppy.
> Sadly this kind of attitude towards breakage in a production
> environment seems makes fedora look bad and like we as a community
> can't even keep simple services
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 22:58:00 +0100, Tim Jackson wrote:
> I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there
> a reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions,
> rather than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing
> that, at
On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 09:12:21 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
> > I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was
> > there a reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing
> > solutions, rather than just putting the new
On 2 November 2019 09:12:21 CET, "Miro Hrončok" wrote:
>On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
>> I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora,
>was there a
>> reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing
>solutions, rather
>> than just putting the new
On 01. 11. 19 22:58, Tim Jackson wrote:
I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there a
reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions, rather
than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing that, at
least adding
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019, at 5:58 PM, Tim Jackson wrote:
> I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there
> a
> reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions, rather
> than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing that, at
I realise this is not exactly news, but when replacing Ask Fedora, was there a
reason to break all the links on the entire web to existing solutions, rather
than just putting the new system on a different domain? Or, failing that, at
least adding (conditional) redirects and/or links to the
26 matches
Mail list logo
