Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

2021-04-27 Thread John Florian
On 4/27/21 1:52 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 4/27/21 5:14 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 >> "Steven A. Falco" wrote: >>> Are there any additional instructions on how to update the bacula >>> database? >

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

2021-04-27 Thread Steven A. Falco
On 4/27/21 5:14 AM, Paul Howarth wrote: On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: Are there any additional instructions on how to update the bacula database? Normally I would use /usr/libexec/bacula/update_mysql_tables but I found in this case that it didn't wo

Re: Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

2021-04-27 Thread Paul Howarth
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:17:49 -0400 "Steven A. Falco" wrote: > This morning "dnf update" brought in bacula 11.0.2-3. Previously I > had been on 9.6.7-1. > > Apparently, the new bacula wants a different database version. I > have version 16, but it wants 10

Bacula 11.0.2-3 for Fedora 33?

2021-04-25 Thread Steven A. Falco
This morning "dnf update" brought in bacula 11.0.2-3. Previously I had been on 9.6.7-1. Apparently, the new bacula wants a different database version. I have version 16, but it wants 1022. I looked at the files in /usr/share/doc/bacula-director/updatedb but there do

Re: Bacula on F29 with Mariadb and no PostgreSQL suddenly seems hardcoded for PostgreSQL, so fails totally

2018-07-02 Thread Bill Damage
Perfect! Thanks very much, this was exactly as you described and was all the fix it needed ;-) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Bacula on F29 with Mariadb and no PostgreSQL suddenly seems hardcoded for PostgreSQL, so fails totally

2018-07-02 Thread Paul Howarth
On Mon, 02 Jul 2018 09:01:08 - "Bill Damage" wrote: > (I'm getting nothing from the Bacula forums so have to ask here). > > F28 is running fine in the same config. > > I was holding back until a regular bacula update came into my F29 > system with a DNF update,

Bacula on F29 with Mariadb and no PostgreSQL suddenly seems hardcoded for PostgreSQL, so fails totally

2018-07-02 Thread Bill Damage
(I'm getting nothing from the Bacula forums so have to ask here). F28 is running fine in the same config. I was holding back until a regular bacula update came into my F29 system with a DNF update, and it did recently. I'm now on 9.0.8. However, it still thinks I'm using PostgreSQL, when

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2015-04-09 Thread James Hogarth
On 13 Dec 2013 13:31, Vitaly Kuznetsov vi...@redhat.com wrote: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: Simone Caronni wrote: http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-12-13 Thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: Simone Caronni wrote: http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation of the 2 projects than your Change page. In particular, he claims

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-26 Thread Simone Caronni
(old unmaintained crippleware vs. new community fork), but of course, if there are legal issues with the fork… :-( sorry for the delay, but some news have been posted today regarding this issue: http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html https://www.bareos.org

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-26 Thread Kevin Kofler
Simone Caronni wrote: http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation of the 2 projects than your Change page. In particular, he claims the community version is not dead. (Is that credible?) (He

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-16 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 11/15/2013 01:19 PM, Simone Caronni wrote: Hello, Bareos is currently in standby following some legal issues: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#Bareos It was added to the Forbidden Items list after I wrote the feature page. Until those are solved, the feature can't simply

F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-15 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bareos Change Owner(s): Simone Caronni negativo17 at gmail.com The powerful Bacula network backup solution has switched from being Open Source friendly to being almost closed source

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-15 Thread Simone Caronni
13:03, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bareos Change Owner(s): Simone Caronni negativo17 at gmail.com The powerful Bacula network backup solution has switched from being Open

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-15 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
: Replace Bacula with Bareos = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bareos Change Owner(s): Simone Caronni negativo17 at gmail.com The powerful Bacula network backup solution has switched from being Open Source friendly to being almost closed source. Originally the project was conceived

Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Replace Bacula with Bareos

2013-11-15 Thread Kevin Kofler
Simone Caronni wrote: Bareos is currently in standby following some legal issues: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forbidden_items#Bareos Can we know what the issues are? Switching would look like a no-brainer (old unmaintained crippleware vs. new community fork), but of course, if there are

Unresponsive mantainer process - bacula package

2013-06-03 Thread Simone Caronni
Hello, following on the mail at: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/179574 I've filed the unresponsive mantainer bug for the bacula package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970016 No package updates were committed, no commits in the git repositories; no bugs

Re: Unresponsive mantainer process - bacula package

2013-06-03 Thread Simone Caronni
Well, he just replied. Nevermind. On 3 June 2013 12:42, Simone Caronni negativ...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, following on the mail at: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/179574 I've filed the unresponsive mantainer bug for the bacula package: https

bacula

2012-10-21 Thread Richard Vickery
I don't know if it is related, however, I just had a bacula crash take place, and can't make a bug report because I have forgotten my username and/or password; is there a link on the site to retrieve this information so that I can make the proper bug report? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel

Re: bacula

2012-10-21 Thread Fabian Affolter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/21/2012 04:24 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: I don't know if it is related, however, I just had a bacula crash take place, and can't make a bug report because I have forgotten my username and/or password; is there a link on the site to retrieve

Re: bacula

2012-10-21 Thread Richard Vickery
, Fabian Affolter f...@fedoraproject.orgwrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/21/2012 04:24 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: I don't know if it is related, however, I just had a bacula crash take place, and can't make a bug report because I have forgotten my username

Re: bacula

2012-10-21 Thread Emmanuel Seyman
* Richard Vickery [21/10/2012 21:24] : It was so long ago that I can't even remember my login, and may have been before I changed my email. I signed up shortly after 1998 and think that I have used it 3 times since - all within 2 years. After this, I have not been able to either sign in or

Re: bacula

2012-10-21 Thread Richard Vickery
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr wrote: * Richard Vickery [21/10/2012 21:24] : It was so long ago that I can't even remember my login, and may have been before I changed my email. I signed up shortly after 1998 and think that I have used it 3 times

Re: bacula

2012-10-21 Thread J. Randall Owens
On 10/21/2012 04:20 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr mailto:emman...@seyman.fr wrote: * Richard Vickery [21/10/2012 21:24] : It was so long ago that I can't even remember my login, and may have been

Re: bacula

2012-10-21 Thread Richard Vickery
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 4:38 PM, J. Randall Owens jrowens.fed...@ghiapet.net wrote: On 10/21/2012 04:20 PM, Richard Vickery wrote: On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr mailto:emman...@seyman.fr wrote: * Richard Vickery [21/10/2012 21:24] :

review of bacula-docs

2012-01-11 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
bacula is already in fedora. why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula ? -- Itamar Reis Peixoto msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br +55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO

Re: review of bacula-docs

2012-01-11 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/12 11:37, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: bacula is already in fedora. why there are a review ( with review + ) for bacula-docs ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941 why not add bacula-docs as sub-package of bacula