On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 11:05 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
> > I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
> > sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
> > non-scratch build of b
On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 04:43:37 am Petr Machata wrote:
> Actually I found the above in 1.37 (not 47) changelog. The ticket #1972
> has been closed for years. See:
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_45_0/libs/filesystem/v2/doc/index.htm
>
Oops, my bad for substituting s/4/3/ somehow in m
07.02.2011 20:03, Zach Carter wrote:
> I believe my package schroot may have been hit by a 1.46 issue that is fixed
> in
> 1.47
>
> Is there a plan to update to 1.47 or backport the fixes?
Not in a systematic manner, but generally yes, we do fixes of this sort.
>
> From the 1.47 changelog:
>
>
On Friday, February 04, 2011 05:33:24 am Petr Machata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
> now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
> for final release that should be out on 7th, jus
On 02/04/2011 03:38 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
>> changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream?
>
> What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binuti
06.02.2011 15:44, Thomas Spura wrote:
> I just rebuild my package and tried a random other one: xsd and it
> failed:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2764873
From the looks of it, this is the case of boost::filesystem v2 vs. v3.
This will get rid of it:
diff --git a/xsd.sp
On Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:05:57 +0100
Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
> > I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
> > sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
> > non-scratch build of b
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> There's going to be a mass rebuild shortly, so those packages should all
> be rebuilt soon.
But the way our mass rebuilds are done does not work for dependency chains
where all involved packages have to be rebuilt in reverse dependency order
to fix the broken dependency
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 11:05:57 +0100,
Petr Machata wrote:
>
> The packages that I tried built OK, so I'm calling this good enough, and
> spinning an official build now. The list of ABI dependences is here.
> These packages really really need to be rebuilt, otherwise they'll stop
> working
04.02.2011 14:33, Petr Machata wrote:
> I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
> sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
> non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today.
The packages that I tried built OK, so I&
Petr Machata wrote:
> +-boost_cv_lib_system_LDFLAGS="-L$boost_ldpath -R$boost_ldpath"
> ++boost_cv_lib_system_LDFLAGS="-L$boost_ldpath -Wl,-R$boost_ldpath"
Actually, the -R switch should be dropped entirely. -R is a shortcut for
--rpath. We don't want an rpath set on $boost_ldpath,
> I'm in the process of test-driving a couple packages locally to make
> sure that the new boost works. If that turns out well, I'll do a
> non-scratch build of boost-1.46.0-0.beta1 later today.
Sounds great. Probably better if this gets kicked off earlier in the
w
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 00:38 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> 04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
> > changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream?
>
> What you are hitting here seems more related to
05.02.2011 00:38, Petr Machata wrote:
> What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binutils change.
> For some reason g++ -R isn't valid anymore. Passing this as g++ -Wl,-R
> fixes the problem (or at least works around it). FWIW I don't see -R in
> gcc manual on F14, must have been obso
04.02.2011 21:10, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstream?
What you are hitting here seems more related to gcc or binutils change.
For some reason g++ -R isn't valid anym
04.02.2011 14:59, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Petr Machata wrote:
>
>> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
>> now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
>> for final release that should be out on 7th, just
On 2/4/11 4:11 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:41 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
>> On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
[snip]
>>> Could we please either have boost.m4 packaged in Fedora, or at least
>>> changes for running with the latest boost in Fedora integrated upstr
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 15:41 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
&
On 2/4/11 3:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
>> now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
>
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 14:33 +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
> now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
> for final release that should be out on 7th, just before t
Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said:
> Petr Machata wrote:
>
> > beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
> > now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
> > for final release that should be out on
Petr Machata wrote:
> beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
> now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
> for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature
> freeze. Providing boost-1.46.0 is o
Hi,
beta of boost-1.46.0 was released recently and packaged yesterday. It's
now in the git, and a scratch build[2] was done. This is in preparation
for final release that should be out on 7th, just before the feature
freeze. Providing boost-1.46.0 is one of features of F15[1].
I
23 matches
Mail list logo
