Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-23 Thread Jan Kaluža
On 11/20/2011 05:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:05:34 -0600, Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to wrote: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to the devel list

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-22 Thread Petr Machata
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to the devel list about this. Yes, Denis Arnaud has kindly prepared a new release, but forgot to give a

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:49 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to the devel list about this. Yes, Denis

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-22 Thread Petr Machata
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes: On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:49 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 22:18 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes: On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 14:49 +0100, Petr Machata wrote: Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff,

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-22 Thread Denis Arnaud
2011/11/22 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com [...] Surprising, no, but it could certainly handled better. You are absolutely right. I fully agree, but what's done is done: I made that mistake, Petr did not. I intended to perform a scratch-build, but omitted the scratch work... Sorry for

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-22 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 01:49 +0100, Denis Arnaud wrote: I guess that you are referring to the following procedure: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO#Requesting_special_dist_tags, aren't you? Pretty much, yep. Is https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4975 an example of

boost soname bump

2011-11-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to the devel list about this. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-20 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:05:34 -0600 Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to the devel list about this. +1 Is the bump for real this time? I

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-20 Thread Thomas Spura
2011/11/20 Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org Is the bump for real this time? I remember that some time ago the soname was bumped but then returned, so I had to do two unneeded builds. -- Unless there are too much problems with this yes:

Re: boost soname bump

2011-11-20 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:05:34 -0600, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It looks like there was a soname bump in boost yesterday. Boost affects enough stuff, that there really should have been a heads up message posted to the devel list about this. It looks like there may have been a