Re: comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

2015-10-03 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bill Nottingham wrote: > Unless something has changed (possible, haven't been playing close > attention), there's no individual package selection for groups, so there > are no UI effects. There are post-install UI effects, especially since the "groups as objects" misfeature. Yum (and I suppose

comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

2015-10-01 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm not sure that this is common knowledge as it is not specifically mentioned in either: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups or https://fedorahosted.org/comps/ that the default type for packagereq is "mandatory". As a result I believe that there

Re: comps packagereq items default to "mandatory"

2015-10-01 Thread Bill Nottingham
Orion Poplawski (or...@cora.nwra.com) said: > Almost none of those appear to be "Mandatory". > > We think this is becoming an issue now because it appears that dnf perhaps now > prevents kickstart installs from removing mandatory packages from the install > set. See