On 03/24/2015 12:25 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Meanwhile I've already added a comment to a related RFE.
I prefer filing bugs only if there is agreement/confirmation that it
is considered a bug to fix eventually. It is entirely non-productive
to open a ticket and have developers disagree or
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 10:03:39AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
To have nice full text search would mean to use full text search
engine. And I suppose that this extra dependency in DNF would be not
welcomed by many - including cloud SIG. However this can be easily
done as plugin and put in
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 06:15:41 -0400 (EDT), Jan Silhan wrote:
I get the same result from dnf search and yum search. It wasn't found
in package name nor summary so it's searched in description.
IMO, it ought to search in filelists either by default or when specifying
the all argument (which is
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:10:05 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
# dnf search libtoolize
Using metadata from Sat Mar 21 15:38:26 2015
= Matched: libtoolize
==
libedit.x86_64 : The NetBSD Editline library
libedit.i686 : The NetBSD
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 21:10:05 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
# dnf search libtoolize
Using metadata from Sat Mar 21 15:38:26 2015
= Matched: libtoolize
==
libedit.x86_64 : The NetBSD Editline library
libedit.i686 : The NetBSD Editline
# dnf search libtoolize
Using metadata from Sat Mar 21 15:38:26 2015
= Matched: libtoolize ==
libedit.x86_64 : The NetBSD Editline library
libedit.i686 : The NetBSD Editline library
D'oh!
It's a false positive, because the word libtoolized
