Dne 25.1.2013 00:02, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:09:57 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 24.1.2013 14:40, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:06:21 +0100,
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
It definitely depends on package. I should
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 20:27:55 -0700,
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Doing more than one asks in certain situations sounds bad, but how about:
fn: fedpkg build --and-newer
Does:
fedpkg build
loop:
fedpkg switch-branch fn+1 (or master)
git merge fn
git push
fedpkg build
goto
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 23:34:57 -0500
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 19:48:25 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Seems complex.
For the logic, the delay part, or a likely implementation?
Yes. ;)
Would it run on the client or on the server side?
I was thinking
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 20:27:55 -0700
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote:
Doing more than one asks in certain situations sounds bad, but how
about:
fn: fedpkg build --and-newer
Does:
fedpkg build
loop:
fedpkg switch-branch fn+1 (or master)
git merge fn
git push
fedpkg
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 05:49:25 + (UTC)
Ben Boeckel maths...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking at this, how about a simple rule about what makes a fedpkg
build cascade up: While the next higher branch has the same version,
but older pre-dist release number, merge --ff-only and trigger a
build if one
On 01/25/2013 10:49 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
Looking at this, how about a simple rule about what makes a fedpkg build
cascade up: While the next higher branch has the same version, but older
pre-dist release number, merge --ff-only and trigger a build if one is
not created within an hour of the
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 19:48:25 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Seems complex.
For the logic, the delay part, or a likely implementation?
Would it run on the client or on the server side?
I was thinking server side at first, but maybe we could have fedpkg
detect this and ask if it's wanted when
On Thu, 24 Jan, 2013 at 02:41:50 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
% bodhi -L systemd
f16-updates systemd-37-25.fc16
f16-updates-candidate systemd-37-25.fc16
f16-updates-testing systemd-37-25.fc16
f17-updates-candidate systemd-44-22.fc17
f17-updates-testing
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:31:03 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
You know, I really dislike packaging things. I love hacking. If I
package something then that's an ugly side effect of what I really
want to do. And thus I'd spend as little time on packaging as I
can.
Ask for
Dne 23.1.2013 22:38, Lennart Poettering napsal(a):
On Wed, 23.01.13 14:20, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to
ask them one way or another about the issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005
Feedback welcome. If
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And I disagree with this proposal.
It is mixed for me. Sometimes, I'd like to update in Rawhide,
especially if the freeze is taking long, while in other cases, I
need to do some bugfix in my packages which is found during testing
Dne 24.1.2013 11:22, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And I disagree with this proposal.
It is mixed for me. Sometimes, I'd like to update in Rawhide,
especially if the freeze is taking long, while in other cases, I
need to do some
On 01/24/2013 04:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 24.01.13 03:54, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:38:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 23.01.13 14:20, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I know we have discussed this before, but I've
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:06:21 +0100,
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
It definitely depends on package. I should be the one who knows about
my packages the best if there is some breaking potential.
Every time you don't do an update in rawhide and rely on inheritence, the
changes
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:06:21PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 24.1.2013 11:22, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a):
The flip side of this is that when you *don't* build in Rawhide you
potentially push work and breakage to somebody else. Your package may
not build in Rawhide, leaving someone else
Dne 24.1.2013 14:40, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:06:21 +0100,
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
It definitely depends on package. I should be the one who knows about
my packages the best if there is some breaking potential.
Every time you don't do an update
On Thu, 24.01.13 08:27, Frank Murphy (frankl...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:31:03 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
You know, I really dislike packaging things. I love hacking. If I
package something then that's an ugly side effect of what I really
want
On Thu, 24.01.13 10:22, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And I disagree with this proposal.
It is mixed for me. Sometimes, I'd like to update in Rawhide,
especially if the freeze is taking long, while in other
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 06:07:08PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 24.01.13 10:22, Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
And I disagree with this proposal.
It is mixed for me. Sometimes, I'd like to update
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:09:57 +0100
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
Dne 24.1.2013 14:40, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:06:21 +0100,
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
It definitely depends on package. I should be the one who knows
about my packages
I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to
ask them one way or another about the issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005
Feedback welcome. If you are a maintainer who doesn't have a minute to
do a rawhide build during the branched cycle, would you be open
On Wed, 23.01.13 14:20, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to
ask them one way or another about the issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005
Feedback welcome. If you are a maintainer who doesn't have a minute
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to
ask them one way or another about the issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005
Feedback welcome. If you are a maintainer who doesn't have a
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 22:38:30 +0100,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Oh, yeah, let's make it even more work to update a package. Because we
have so much free time, let's let humans do what computers could do
better.
What if there were was an automated process that did the
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 22:38:30 +0100,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
I'd propose instead that mass branching goes away entirely, and the
master branch too.
This is kind of how things work now at a repo level. There are a couple of
On Wed, 23.01.13 20:59, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote:
Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to writes:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 22:38:30 +0100,
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
I'd propose instead that mass branching goes away entirely, and the
master branch too.
This is
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:22:18 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Well, I fully acknowledge that haveing the same sources for the
distros should not imply to have the same binaries. However, that's
really something to solve on the build scripts level. Or in other
words, as
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:38:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 23.01.13 14:20, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to
ask them one way or another about the issue:
On Thu, 24.01.13 03:54, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:38:30PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 23.01.13 14:20, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote:
I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to
ask them one way or
Kevin Fenzi píše v St 23. 01. 2013 v 19:41 -0700:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 03:22:18 +0100
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Well, I fully acknowledge that haveing the same sources for the
distros should not imply to have the same binaries. However, that's
really something to
30 matches
Mail list logo
