On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 17:52 +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> At the same time I also liked to hear some of reasoning behind the reasons
> for the
> wallpaper. IMHO it is shame that at least a short abstract it is not
> available here.
https://pagure.io/design/issue/669
--
Adam Williamson
On Friday, 17 April 2020 19.05.40 WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I really do not see how you could construct this reply from Michael's.
> He clearly starts with IMO and the rest of is the expression of his opinion,
> he never calls anyone anything.
>
> I'm confused here.
>
> Pierre
I left
That something ugly comes by default or bad integrated is not the end of the
world, but is bad... I don't use things that come by default. Can we copy
something minimal from the KDE Store?
https://store.kde.org/s/KDE%20Store/browse/cat/299/order/latest/
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:10 AM Benson Muite
wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > Hi Leigh,
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> > > use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
> >
> >
On 2020-04-19 22:26, Peter Oliver wrote:
Well, I don't see how it makes sense to deliberately create a low-quality
image with no technical need (nor technical benefits such as size saving).
I'd suggest it's for roughly the same reason that people still paint paintings
when, nowadays, they
Le 20-04-17 à 09 h 09, Benson Muite a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
Elections for alternative wallpapers are currently open:
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/elections/
Please vote for ones that you like.
Is the default wallpaper the result of a vote, or
> Well, I don't see how it makes sense to deliberately create a low-quality
> image with no technical need (nor technical benefits such as size saving).
I'd suggest it's for roughly the same reason that people still paint paintings
when, nowadays, they could just take a photograph. I don't
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 10:13 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> after a few particularly unflattering ones had been selected: inside
> jokes (and one that also happened to offend all Hindus, vegetarians, and
> vegans at once),
I happen to be offended by that slight of offense! /s
Seriously, as a
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 15:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> And to Michael's point about Ubuntu's branding, they have a set of
>> design principles that they use to simultaneously present "Ubuntu" and
>> the Ubuntu "release" by leveraging their codename scheme and imbuing
>>
Adam Williamson wrote:
> for instance, the halftoning is a choice
Well, I don't see how it makes sense to deliberately create a low-quality
image with no technical need (nor technical benefits such as size saving).
Kevin Kofler
___
devel
Hello everyone!
I specially love this one:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Sky-background3-c.png Shame it's so
small.
I don't feel like my screen is broken. While I'm not a big fan of squares
and similar background, I did appreciate the retro style. I didn't assume
there was something
> > > Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
> >
> >
> > It's a free country with free speech.
> > If you don't like it don't read it!
>
> Leigh's message wasn't targeted at any given individual, and to make this a
> CoC issue is absurd. If anything, attacking
On Saturday, April 18, 2020 2:00:27 AM MST Göran Uddeborg wrote:
> Leigh Scott:
>
> > If there any plan to fix them?
>
>
> Pick another if you don't like the default.
It's a larger issue than that if the default wallpapers make people think
they're having graphics issues..
--
John M.
On Friday, April 17, 2020 10:49:18 PM MST Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
>
>
> It's a free country with free speech.
> If you don't like it don't read it!
Leigh's message wasn't targeted at any given individual, and to make this
> My personal favorites were Fedora Core 5 and Fedora Core 6:
>
> FC5: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers#Fedora_Core_5
> FC6: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wallpapers#Fedora_Core_6
Ha, I never realised that wiki page existed, it brings back good memories :)
Of the recent releases F-26
Leigh Scott:
> If there any plan to fix them?
Pick another if you don't like the default.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 18. 04. 20 7:49, Leigh Scott wrote:
Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
It's a free country with free speech.
Whatever country you are talking about, this is Fedora and not a country and in
Fedora, we are nice to each other. Telling you not to express
On 18 April 2020 07:49:18 CEST, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
>
>It's a free country with free speech.
>If you don't like it don't read it!
You do realise that asking someone nicely is not the same as trying to take
away their
> Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
It's a free country with free speech.
If you don't like it don't read it!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 3:24 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 15:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >
> > Of the two, I loved FC6 more, because I thought the way the Fedora
> > logo was used throughout the artwork was really well-done. And it
> > conveyed what I felt Fedora was
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 15:13 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Of the two, I loved FC6 more, because I thought the way the Fedora
> logo was used throughout the artwork was really well-done. And it
> conveyed what I felt Fedora was about very well: Fedorans are the
> community, and the community is
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:04 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> FWIW I quite like the final version of the wallpaper. I don't like is
> that it was changed at the last minute prior to final release -- that
> was a process problem, for sure -- but I'm happy with the result. It's
> not crap. That's
On 17 April 2020 21:00:55 CEST, "John M. Harris Jr"
wrote:
>On Friday, April 17, 2020 5:49:48 AM MST Leigh Scott wrote:
>> If there any plan to fix them?
>>
>> https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202
>> 020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
>
>Wow, that does look
On Friday, April 17, 2020 5:49:48 AM MST Leigh Scott wrote:
> If there any plan to fix them?
>
> https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202
> 020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
Wow, that does look pretty shitty. Perhaps one of the old ones could be re-
used?
--
John M.
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:49:48 -
"Leigh Scott" wrote:
> If there any plan to fix them?
>
> https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
As a contrasting opinion, I accept, and am indifferent to, whatever
wallpaper the Fedora release
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 06:04:21PM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>On Friday, 17 April 2020 16.03.49 WEST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
>> I guess personal taste is at issue here, so I will provide the complete
>
>> opposite feedback. IMO our default wallpapers are at their best when
>
On Friday, 17 April 2020 16.03.49 WEST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I guess personal taste is at issue here, so I will provide the complete
> opposite feedback. IMO our default wallpapers are at their best when
> they're abstract and geometric. The new version of the F32 wallpaper is
> one of my
>When I updated, I honestly thought that my graphics drivers were broken.
Me too.
Geoff Marr
IRC: coremodule
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 8:09 AM Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:51 PM Leigh Scott
> wrote:
>
>> If there any plan to fix them?
>>
>>
>>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:47:54PM +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> On 17.04.20 16:07, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Especially the one in Fedora 15 (GNOME edition) and 16 was outstanding.
> > Can we do more of those, please?
>
> Not weighing in on the merits of the current art, but 16 is still my
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:12 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 16:09 +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > > Hi Leigh,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> > > > use
On Fri, 2020-04-17 at 16:09 +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > > Hi Leigh,
> > >
> > >
> > > Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> > > use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
> >
>
FWIW I quite like the final version of the wallpaper. I don't like is
that it was changed at the last minute prior to final release -- that
was a process problem, for sure -- but I'm happy with the result. It's
not crap. That's just rude.
I'm disappointed with default wallpapers in the latest
On 17.04.20 16:07, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Especially the one in Fedora 15 (GNOME edition) and 16 was outstanding.
> Can we do more of those, please?
Not weighing in on the merits of the current art, but 16 is still my
favourite default artwork of any distro, ever.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:51 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> If there any plan to fix them?
>
>
> https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
When I updated, I honestly thought that my graphics drivers were broken. I
don't think that's a
On 17 April 2020 15:17:50 CEST, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>>
>> Hi Leigh,
>>
>> Elections for alternative wallpapers are currently open:
>> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/elections/
>> Please vote for ones that you like.
>>
>> The
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Hi Leigh,
>
> Elections for alternative wallpapers are currently open:
> https://apps.fedoraproject.org/nuancier/elections/
> Please vote for ones that you like.
>
> The submission phase for Fedora 32 has unfortunately already closed.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020, at 4:02 PM, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Hi Leigh,
> >
> >
> > Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> > use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
>
> That was the nicest term I could use to describe it!
>
> >
> > I
> > Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> > use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
>
> That was the nicest term I could use to describe it!
Well then please don't express your opinion then and keep it to yourself.
> Hi Leigh,
>
>
> Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
> use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
That was the nicest term I could use to describe it!
>
> I personally quite like the 90s retro look.
>
> >
>
Hi Leigh,
> If there any plan to fix them?
Do you think you could please use nicer language? There's no need to
use words like that to describe other people's work in the community.
I personally quite like the 90s retro look.
>
If there any plan to fix them?
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
41 matches
Mail list logo
