On Seg, 2014-09-08 at 02:36 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
Hi,
There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
sorry.
Hi,
I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds ,
no longer breaks rpmfusion builds
On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 15:30 +0200, Václav Pavlín wrote:
Hi,
There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
sorry.
Hi,
I think this still breaking rpmfusion builds , in some packages like
kplayer [1]. rpmfusion got a older version of Mock, Version: 1.1.21 [2]
ends
On Qua, 2014-08-27 at 07:28 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds, particularly
because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
Conflicts: systemd
Example qt:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7452802
Lennart Poettering píše v St 27. 08. 2014 v 21:15 +0200:
On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
Talk to Michal Sekletar about it then - he is
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:01:45PM -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
I think you are readying way to much into a perfectly normal word that
means: hey we are discussing stuff related to your project, would you
mind joining this
It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
as long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working
on). I made a mistake and it ended up being pulled in buildroot.
Ping me on IRC if you have
On 08/27/2014 03:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
Talk to Michal Sekletar about it then - he is working on
On Thu, 28.08.14 08:40, Lukáš Nykrýn (lnyk...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
I think that there was a problem in communication. We are *not* going to
create systemd-container in fedora. That was just for rhel, because at
least I wanted some quick and dirty solution. Our current plan in fedora
is
On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about how
big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at least
is 150K or so only. Is there really any value in doing this weird stuff
for a
On 28 August 2014 12:10, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about
how
big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at
least
is
On 08/28/2014 02:10 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 28.08.14 07:24, Daniel J Walsh (dwa...@redhat.com) wrote:
But regarding kmod/devicemapper, can we please get some stats about how
big this individually are, and how much is saved by this? kmod at least
is 150K or so only. Is there
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds, particularly
because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
Conflicts: systemd
Example qt:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7452802
(which is no direct systemd dependencies, mind you)
I can
On August 27, 2014 at 7:28 AM Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds,
particularly
because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
Conflicts: systemd
Example qt:
Hi,
There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
sorry.
Vaclav
On St 27. srpen 2014, 15:23:27 CEST, Jerry Vonau wrote:
On August 27, 2014 at 7:28 AM Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds,
On Aug 27, 2014 9:23 PM, Jerry Vonau m...@jvonau.ca wrote:
That has a sub-build[1] that is failing but for a different reason:
Error: Package: harfbuzz-icu-0.9.35-2.fc22.x86_64 (build)
Requires: libicuuc.so.52()(64bit)
Might be fallout from the gcc mass rebuild.
Not that case.
On Wed, 27.08.14 07:28, Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) wrote:
Seems the fakesystemd package is breaking some rawhide builds, particularly
because it is getting pulled into the buildroot and that it contains:
Conflicts: systemd
Example qt:
Hi Lennart,
It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least as
long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working on). I
made a mistake and it ended up being pulled in buildroot.
Ping me on
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:20, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
as long as it takes to prepare systemd-container Michal is working
on). I made a
On St 27. srpen 2014, 20:27:51 CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:20, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
Heya,
It's a package that fakes systemd presence in system. It's solely
intended for Docker images as we don't want systemd there (at least
as long as it takes
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
So what is systemd-container supposed to do? And what precisely is
fakesystemd supposed to do? And that mini thing?
fakesystemd owns same directories systemd does and has set provides
to fulfill most RPM dependencies for
On St 27. srpen 2014, 20:47:33 CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
So what is systemd-container supposed to do? And what precisely is
fakesystemd supposed to do? And that mini thing?
fakesystemd owns same directories systemd
On Wed, 27.08.14 21:00, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
I also offered to split out the hwdb in Brno, if you remember. If this
is about the hwdb, then let's just do that...
Talk to Michal Sekletar about it then - he is working on something
we call systemd-container internally. We
- Original Message -
On St 27. srpen 2014, 20:47:33 CEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 27.08.14 20:35, Václav Pavlín (vpav...@redhat.com) wrote:
I am not on the base WG. I was not selected for it. If you come up with
schemes like this, it is really a good idea to actually ask
Václav Pavlín wrote:
Hi,
There is new fakesystemd build for F21 which should fix the breakage,
sorry.
Thanks, seems to have done the trick.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Wed, 2014-08-27 at 16:43 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
If the general perception is that one has to be “invited” into the
WGs, that would explain why we ended up with several WGs that are
often not much bigger than the 9 voting places, and it would be
something we should urgently fix (or if
Hi
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:05 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
I think you are readying way to much into a perfectly normal word that
means: hey we are discussing stuff related to your project, would you
mind joining this sessions so we can have better understanding ?
That's possible. The
26 matches
Mail list logo
