Re: gcc: RPM_ARCH not defined

2023-01-24 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Thank you, Tomas, Great investigation. Your suggested hack really fixed my issue. On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:46 PM Tomas Korbar wrote: > Hello, > since i encountered this in the past and postponed it, I did a bit of a > digging and found this: > As you probably found out by now it is caused by

Re: gcc: RPM_ARCH not defined

2023-01-23 Thread Tomas Korbar
Hello, since i encountered this in the past and postponed it, I did a bit of a digging and found this: As you probably found out by now it is caused by package-notes being dependent on environment variables that are expected to be present during package build. See the actual package-notes file

Re: gcc: RPM_ARCH not defined

2023-01-23 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/01/23 21:54: Lukas Javorsky wrote on 2023/01/23 21:39: Hi, I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it started to fail since Fedora 37. The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined " Prior to the

Re: gcc: RPM_ARCH not defined

2023-01-23 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Lukas Javorsky wrote on 2023/01/23 21:39: Hi, I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it started to fail since Fedora 37. The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined " Prior to the Fedora 37 the test was passing without any

gcc: RPM_ARCH not defined

2023-01-23 Thread Lukas Javorsky
Hi, I've been looking at our upstreamed test [1] for libarchive package and it started to fail since Fedora 37. The error is: "gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined " Prior to the Fedora 37 the test was passing without any issue. Did anyone here had a similar problem?