Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2 to
X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
These seem to be associated with code that does 'if (strcmp (s1, s2) == 0)'
For example:
dir.c: In
On 3/7/11 9:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1
cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
These seem to be associated with code that does 'if
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:14:57AM -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 3/7/11 9:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1
cmp C2 to X cmp C1 +- C2
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2
to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
These seem to be
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 04:37:20PM +0100, yersinia wrote:
I remeber that gnu lib have a similar macro, and last year there was a
fix
http://old.nabble.com/-PATCH--define-STREQ%28a,-b%29-consistently,-removing-useless-parentheses-td27293621.html
I understand Jim's argument, although I think
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Compiling libguestfs using gcc-4.6.0-0.11.fc15.x86_64 gives lots of:
error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when changing X +- C1 cmp C2
to X cmp C1 +- C2 [-Werror=strict-overflow]
These seem to be associated with code that does 'if (strcmp (s1, s2) == 0)'
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 05:09:17PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
I suspect that there was a problem with .11, perhaps one of these:
* Fri Mar 04 2011 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com 4.6.0-0.12
- update from trunk
- PRs c++/46159, c++/46282, c++/47200, c++/47774, c++/47851,
