On 12/02/19 10:55 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:49:23AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On that basis, why does gcc-c++ install libgomp and libgfortran?
I think gcc-c++ doesn't require libgfortran, gcc-gfortran does.
Ah yes, sorry. I ran 'mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:49:23AM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On that basis, why does gcc-c++ install libgomp and libgfortran?
I think gcc-c++ doesn't require libgfortran, gcc-gfortran does.
The reason to have libgomp in the dependencies was that it is a library that
isn't explicitly used
On 11/02/19 12:20 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:
> On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
>>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is
On 11/02/19 12:14 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Jonathan Wakely:
On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
Hi,
I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
package. My program fails, because it
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:14:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jonathan Wakely:
>
> > On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
> >>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
>
* Jonathan Wakely:
> On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
>>gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
>>package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is
>>this
On 08/02/19 19:56 -0600, Patrick Diehl wrote:
Hi,
I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is
this the supposed behavior to
Hi,
I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install
gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++
package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is
this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic
become one of
