Hello Roberto,
- Original Message -
> From: "Roberto Ragusa"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2020 5:20:38 PM
> Subject: Re: gpg-agents all over the place
>
> On 12/23/20 1:56 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
>
> > More proble
On 12/23/20 1:56 PM, Oron Peled wrote:
More problematic, but possible.
The key is using "--pinentry-mode=loopback" (I don't have my scripts in front
of me for further details)
There are simple use cases that are very problematic.
Consider this:
[me@localhost tmp]$ date >date.txt
On Thursday, 17 December 2020 00:08:48 IST Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Roberto Ragusa writes:
>
> > On 12/16/20 2:55 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> >
> >> Believe it or not, GNU/Linux is no longer a text-only operating system, nor
> >> are window managers just a container for terminal
Roberto Ragusa writes:
On 12/16/20 2:55 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Believe it or not, GNU/Linux is no longer a text-only operating system, nor
are window managers just a container for terminal emulators. :-)
But that is different than saying the GNU/Linux has become a no-text
On 12/16/20 2:55 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Believe it or not, GNU/Linux is no longer a text-only operating system, nor
are window managers just a container for terminal emulators. :-)
But that is different than saying the GNU/Linux has become a no-text operating
system.Version 2 of
Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> But, for some reason that I do not understand, the existing terminal
> interface always gets broken.
Well, how prompts in terminal emulator sessions in the GUI should work is a
design decision. Some people (like you, apparently) expect
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> But, for some reason that I do not understand, the existing terminal
> interface always gets broken.
Well, how prompts in terminal emulator sessions in the GUI should work is a
design decision. Some people (like you, apparently) expect them to behave
the terminal way
Kevin Kofler via devel writes:
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I miss the days when gpg needed a passphrase it simply prompted a message
> on standard output, turned off tty echo, and just read the password that I
> typed in.
>
> But that was too simple, primitive, and bulletproof. I guess that things
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> I miss the days when gpg needed a passphrase it simply prompted a message
> on standard output, turned off tty echo, and just read the password that I
> typed in.
>
> But that was too simple, primitive, and bulletproof. I guess that things
> can't be as simple any more,
Marius Schwarz writes:
Hi,
I sorry to tell you, that gpg-agents are inflating on numbers in Fedora
systems:
I miss the days when gpg needed a passphrase it simply prompted a message on
standard output, turned off tty echo, and just read the password that I
typed in.
But that was too
Hi,
I sorry to tell you, that gpg-agents are inflating on numbers in Fedora
systems:
As far as I understand ssh-agents, you start ONE for each user, but
here, one for each repo is opened by PackageKit:
(today)
root 2530 0.0 0.0 151908 892 ? Ss 14:32 0:00
gpg-agent
11 matches
Mail list logo
