, but they do require valid grub1 *configuration files* to
start. So while these images will survive grub1's eventual retirement,
they will still need grubby to support grub1 configuration files for the
foreseeable future so kernel updates can continue to work correctly. Is
that realistic
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 09:58:53AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
(In short, pvgrub! I thought that was dead and buried a long time ago ..)
Of course I'm confusing this with PyGrub, that was the old horrible
thing. PvGrub is the shiny new thing.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
valid grub1 *configuration files* to
start. So while these images will survive grub1's eventual retirement,
they will still need grubby to support grub1 configuration files for the
foreseeable future so kernel updates can continue to work correctly. Is
that realistic? Are there currently any
On 09/22/2011 09:09 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
Grubby will continue to support the grub 1 style config file.
Just to confirm ...
Does this mean that a RHEL 6/Fedora dual-boot system using grub 1 will
continue to work (i.e. Fedora kernel updates will properly update the
grub 1 configuration)?
--
On 09/22/2011 04:31 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 09/22/2011 09:09 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
Grubby will continue to support the grub 1 style config file.
Just to confirm ...
Does this mean that a RHEL 6/Fedora dual-boot system using grub 1 will
continue to work (i.e. Fedora kernel updates will
these images will survive grub1's eventual retirement,
they will still need grubby to support grub1 configuration files for the
foreseeable future so kernel updates can continue to work correctly. Is
that realistic? Are there currently any plans to kill off grubby's
grub1 support at some point
