Re: heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Mark Wielaard
Dan Horák dan at danny.cz writes: there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified. I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround: On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote: mysql defines min

Re: heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:52:24PM +, Mark Wielaard wrote: Dan Horák dan at danny.cz writes: there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified. I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround: I

Re: heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com writes: On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote: mysql defines min and max to be macros in my_global.h which conflicts with the definition of max and min in numeric_limits in limits. This use of max and min is described in the WG14 c++ standard under

Re: heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
tgl wrote: [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support in mysql. [...] We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build and respin systemtap today or tomorrow. But the real issue here is that systemtap has got to be more chary of what they

Re: heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-19 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: tgl wrote: [...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support in mysql. [...] We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build and respin systemtap today or tomorrow. But the

heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-18 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
Hi - FYI, rawhide received a new build of systemtap-1.4 yesterday. (f13 and f14 may get it too, subject to update policy interest). Beyond its direct users, it affects those packages that build with the sys/sdt.h markers. A subsequent rebuild of these will switch to the new sys/sdt.h

Re: heads-up: systemtap-sdt-devel rebase in rawhide

2011-01-18 Thread Dan Horák
Frank Ch. Eigler píše v Út 18. 01. 2011 v 12:22 -0500: Hi - FYI, rawhide received a new build of systemtap-1.4 yesterday. (f13 and f14 may get it too, subject to update policy interest). Beyond its direct users, it affects those packages that build with the sys/sdt.h markers. A