Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-28 Thread Ian Malone
On 28 January 2014 06:48, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1],

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-28 Thread Ian Malone
On 28 January 2014 07:05, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 22:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Denis Fateyev
Hello all, I haven't thought about possible replacement plans, in my opinion it's too early to talk about that now. As for the packaging process, the package requires some rework and improvement - it's actually in the process. It takes some time and efforts from a submitter (Antonio Trande),

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Ian Malone
On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. I'd argue it's *less* free since it seeks to restrict what you can do: Finally, we need to

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Icecat package review has NOT the goal to replace Firefox in Fedora. I wish to offer the opportunity to everyone of try a browser like so a GNU user would do. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread poma
On 27.01.2014 05:08, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? Thanks. [1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:45:48 +0100 poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 27.01.2014 05:08, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? Thanks.

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread poma
On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: copr has no provision currently to sign packages. I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in a secure way. Ouch! poma -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread poma
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/ Results: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/ http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/fedora-20-x86_64/

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Antonio Trande
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2014 07:56 PM, poma wrote: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/ Results: http://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/Icecat/

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Andrew Lutomirski
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: copr has no provision currently to sign packages. I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in a secure way. Ouch! I'm skeptical about the whole

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread poma
On 27.01.2014 20:17, Antonio Trande wrote: On 01/27/2014 07:56 PM, poma wrote: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sagitter/Icecat/builds/ … Package URLs: http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/Icecat/icecat-24.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Not Found The requested URL /Icecat/icecat-24.0-1.fc20.src.rpm was

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread poma
On 27.01.2014 20:28, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 27.01.2014 19:52, Kevin Fenzi wrote: copr has no provision currently to sign packages. I think it's on the todo list, but it will not be easy to implement in a secure

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 20:41:35 +0100 poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: On 27.01.2014 20:28, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 10:59 AM, poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote: ...snip... I'm skeptical about the whole package-signing thing. skeptical in what way?

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. I'd argue it's *less* free

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-27 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 22:48 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 11:52 +, Ian Malone wrote: On 27 January 2014 05:36, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote: On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which

icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-26 Thread Christopher Meng
Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? Thanks. [1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-26 Thread punto...@libero.it
Il 27/01/2014 05:08, Christopher Meng ha scritto: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? Thanks. [1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Noob here.

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-26 Thread Kenjiro Nakayama
: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 送信済み: 2014年1月27日, 月曜日 午後 1:26:42 件名: Re: icecat or/and firefox? Il 27/01/2014 05:08, Christopher Meng ha scritto: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? Thanks. [1]--https

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-26 Thread Rahul Sundaram
Hi On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? Thanks. [1]--https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 -- I would say we

Re: icecat or/and firefox?

2014-01-26 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 01/27/2014 05:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: Hi, Here is an interesting package icecat[1], which is a more free version firefox. Do we allow this in Fedora now? My view: It's a package like any arbitrary other. So, if it complies to the rules applied elsewhere, I don't see much reasons