On Thu, 10.02.11 09:33, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not
think it is too good idea.
Well, I think the fear of making something
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not
think it is too good idea.
Well, I think the fear of making something SUID root is not reason
enough not to make things technically correct.
How
Le Mar 8 février 2011 08:42, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi,
just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre
4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach
to your old screen
Le Mar 8 février 2011 15:05, Tomas Mraz a écrit :
I think much more reasonable is to just accept the fact that it might be
very reasonable and desirable on some multiuser system to allow users
having background processes that can keep running even after the user
logs out and not to try to
On Wed, 09.02.11 10:33, Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mail...@laposte.net) wrote:
Le Mar 8 février 2011 15:05, Tomas Mraz a écrit :
I think much more reasonable is to just accept the fact that it might be
very reasonable and desirable on some multiuser system to allow users
having
Le Mer 9 février 2011 10:33, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
It's kind of ironic that our main UI (gnome3) is changing to be more
video-appliance-like, but at the same time we've been killing all the bits
like background processes that would have made it a good appliance fit (see
also freedombox).
Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
Fact is that people have been requesting the ability to have guaranteed
clean-up of processes on logout, and we do provide this now (though only
opt-in) with systemd. If this is enabled this currently breaks
screen. And I think it would make sense
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:42:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
- $HOME/.screen is used as socket directory instead of
/var/run/screen
$HOME is no place to place unix sockets. Unfortunately $HOME might be
one
On Tue, 08.02.11 12:09, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:42:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
- $HOME/.screen is used as socket directory instead of
/var/run/screen
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 12:40 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 08.02.11 12:09, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 08:42:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
-
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
[Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left
after logout blindly on all systems.
Not that I disagree with your statement (I tend to agree) in general,
but how is screen is running but detached morally equivalent to
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:28 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
[Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left
after logout blindly on all systems.
Not that I disagree with your statement (I tend to agree) in general,
O
n Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:33:08PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 14:28 +, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 03:05:03PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote:
[Let's] not to try to enforce rules such as no user process left
after logout blindly on all systems.
Not
On Tue, 08.02.11 15:05, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
Precisely for issues like this XDG_RUNTIME_DIR has recently been
introduced:
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
We carefully made sure to define the semantics of this dir to offer a
On Fri, 04.02.11 16:30, Miroslav Lichvar (mlich...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hi,
just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre
4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach
to your old screen session.
There are actually three incompatible changes:
Hi,
just a heads up, the screen package in rawhide was updated to a pre
4.1.0 git snapshot and after the update you won't be able to reattach
to your old screen session.
There are actually three incompatible changes:
- the change in screen protocol
- $HOME/.screen is used as socket directory
16 matches
Mail list logo
