On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:43:48 +0200, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This isn't required, no. That being said, if this package is abandoned
> upstream then it probably makes sense to contact the Debian maintainer
> and establish a fork where our projects can at least share patches. If
> upstream comes ba
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:46 PM Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 23:33:32 +0200, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > > Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename`
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Mon, 02 Sep 2019 23:33:32 +0200, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename`
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472
> >
> > Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 09:33:29PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename`
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472
>
> Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream is dead while Fedora package
> maintainer requires to upstream
Hi,
Fix stack overflow in: `inotifytools_replace_filename`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741472
Not sure how to fix this crashing bug. Upstream is dead while Fedora package
maintainer requires to upstream the fix first. A Catch 22.
Debian has the crasher fixed by an off-trunk simp